Re: [TLS] Industry Concerns about TLS 1.3

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 28 September 2016 00:29 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4CD812B042 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.617
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.617 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tPE_8noX0auI for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1F5112B52D for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6766BE49; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 01:29:20 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OAOuz-RoH6Eu; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 01:29:19 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.210] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53925BE47; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 01:29:19 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1475022559; bh=gainAck9uo7pahOohCVjQQXwpy5kmdnvb/O/KHE00F4=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ns4ORtQ9o9zzRDKWejzusq0huZa47UteBVcX0+3xkUeISRN3aiBOC9dDOMG5DJxWM E9+OdkVD+VdcORPsYLEu06HWREw7zSXyYAZVqODVHTx2qDh8xSG8eyUJPCHbOF6d7G 3s+TvHjfaukEUwH8cmVsG4KTK8gpBPQoz4otCr0Q=
To: Seth David Schoen <schoen@eff.org>, BITS Security <BITSSecurity@fsroundtable.org>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
References: <DM5PR11MB1419B782D2BEF0E0A35E420DF4C90@DM5PR11MB1419.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CADi0yUPZzLrPize4eKpASdM=2nm1h1T2UXs7_sdk2eDv=ku_2w@mail.gmail.com> <DM5PR11MB14192A617ED199BB83E920C4F4CC0@DM5PR11MB1419.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <20160927183022.GM25826@demorgan> <20160928001711.GW25826@demorgan>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <4085a9e5-ad7b-d5d4-4eb9-f1a314d81391@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 01:29:19 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160928001711.GW25826@demorgan>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms090501020203020607080806"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ftmIGrmMxLq5lcPLxvI0QXwZY20>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Industry Concerns about TLS 1.3
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:29:26 -0000


On 28/09/16 01:17, Seth David Schoen wrote:
> People with audit authority can then know all of the secrets,

How well does that whole audit thing work in the financial services
industry?  (Sorry, couldn't resist:-)

S.