Re: [Tools-discuss] Early preview of upcoming changes to the agenda pages

Hmm. I don't see any such column on my screen (Firefox 101.0.1 on Windows 10).

All I see is a magnifying-glass search icon that opens a search window that fails to find anything when I enter a WG name, although it can find a few things, like "hackathon" and "plenary". For a WG name, it says "No event matching your search query."

Regards
    Brian Carpenter

On 16-Jun-22 12:13, Bob Hinden wrote:
> Cindy,
> 
> Even with regular resolution, if I make the window shorter (less hight), the filter area doesn’t scroll for me either.
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
>> On Jun 15, 2022, at 4:28 PM, Cindy Morgan <cmorgan@amsl.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> With the acknowledgment that I may be a edge case in that I have the display resolution on my Mac set to 1536 X 960 instead of the default 1792 x 1120 because my vision is bad: In both Firefox 100.0.2 and Safari 14.0.2, the right hand column (the one that starts with "Filter Areas + Groups...") does not appear to be scrollable, such that if my window size isn't maxed out, the "Jump to" dates later in the week stop being visible and I can't get to them.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Cindy
>>
>>> On Jun 15, 2022, at 3:00 PM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> All -
>>>
>>> The code that generates the agenda pages has been iteratively changed over many meetings and it has grown to the point that it is very difficult to maintain.
>>>
>>> We have a re-implementation in progress that assumes a different way of rendering the agendas from the outset. It has the browser doing most of the work. At the moment, it front-loads all of the data that drives it before showing anything, so the initial load is still quite long, but that will change to fetching data as it's needed as we go forward.
>>>
>>> We've deployed the current version at the sandbox - please take some time to play around at https://sandbox.ietf.org/meeting/113/agenda and send feedback to this list, or directly to nick or me (addresses in the headers). In particular, let us know if something looks broken or if the new approach is missing something that you have relied on.
>>>
>>> We currently expect to finish the re-implementation and merge this into production before IETF 114.
>>>
>>> RjS
>>>
>>> ___________________________________________________________
>>> Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org
>>> This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports.
>>> * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to: datatracker-project@ietf.org
>>> * Report all other bugs or issues to: support@ietf.org
>>> List info (including how to Unsubscribe): https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>>>
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________
>> Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org
>> This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports.
>> * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to: datatracker-project@ietf.org
>> * Report all other bugs or issues to: support@ietf.org
>> List info (including how to Unsubscribe): https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
> 
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports.
> * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to: datatracker-project@ietf.org
> * Report all other bugs or issues to: support@ietf.org
> List info (including how to Unsubscribe): https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss