IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsvwg] Adopting draft-behringer-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying as WG item?

RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com> Mon, 28 January 2008 13:57 UTC

Return-path: <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JJUUA-0008Un-OV; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:57:18 -0500
Received: from tsvwg by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JJUUA-0008Ps-3m for tsvwg-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:57:18 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JJUU9-0008OY-ME for tsvwg@ietf.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:57:17 -0500
Received: from eastrmmtao107.cox.net ([68.230.240.59]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JJUU9-0004RW-8s for tsvwg@ietf.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:57:17 -0500
Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080128135715.SDOM8815.eastrmmtao107.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net>; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:57:15 -0500
Received: from [10.30.20.71] ([68.10.117.240]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id idw21Y00L5BGrj00000000; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:56:02 -0500
From: RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
To: Francois Le Faucheur IMAP <flefauch@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C4F8E8A5-0881-4128-89A1-19BCDCADD8E1@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] Adopting draft-behringer-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying as WG item?
References: <47974BDB.70406@ericsson.com> <CD8D57B6-EB94-4DCE-A42A-02BC5F573A13@nokia.com> <7A1BB0E8-5EFB-4341-918A-F841DB1B57FF@cisco.com> <A268781D-F81A-48B3-8042-1892AC93B749@nokia.com> <C4F8E8A5-0881-4128-89A1-19BCDCADD8E1@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <1EDF3BF8-3AF4-4D2E-AE41-4CCDC5D98618@extremenetworks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915)
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:57:16 -0500
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Cc: ext Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, Randall Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>, Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com>, tsvwg list IETF <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org

On  28 Jan 2008, at 08:53, Francois Le Faucheur IMAP wrote:
> We feel that there are some holes in existing key management  
> approaches for RSVP.

In fact, I am not aware of *any* practical key management
approaches for RSVP at present.

If someone thinks they have one that works when all the
participants along the dynamic RSVP path are not knowable
a priori, which is the normal case with RSVP use, please do
share. :-)

Yours,

Ran Atkinson
rja@extremenetworks.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email