Re: [Tsvwg] Adopting draft-behringer-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying as WG item?

[Lars Eggert <[e-mail]>]

On 2008-1-28, at 15:47, ext RJ Atkinson wrote:
> On  28 Jan 2008, at 04:59, Francois Le Faucheur wrote:
>> On 24 Jan 2008, at 18:04, Lars Eggert wrote:
>>
>>> (individual hat on)
>>>
>>> I'm not convinced that this document needs to be a TSVWG document.  
>>> It's an Informational document that surveys group keying options  
>>> for RSVP, and as such could be published directly through the RFC  
>>> Editor.
>
> Lars,
>    Are you *objecting* to the document becoming a TSV WG
> informational document xor merely observing that multiple
> options on handling the draft exist in theory ?

The latter - I'm not convinced it needs to become a TSVWG document,  
but I also don't see a reason for it not to, *if* we're clear that  
this adoption does not motivate or request and solutions work elsewhere.

Lars