IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Gorry Fairhurst Individual thoughts on choosing whether/how to advance ECN work.

Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Sun, 24 May 2020 08:01 UTC

Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428EC3A0911 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2020 01:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Th_WdIxB2NR for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2020 01:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:42:150::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7094C3A0A19 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 May 2020 01:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Gs-MacBook-Pro.lan (fgrpf.plus.com [212.159.18.54]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3B3A1B00179 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 May 2020 09:01:34 +0100 (BST)
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
References: <dbc71da6-70f1-7369-1d2d-f08fb3b08b69@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <21483444.sDhFMENYeD@linux-9daj> <a85600da-e69f-9190-7ca1-d23a7e7246f9@bobbriscoe.net> <3267993.nvHYsSR2bi@linux-9daj> <dd8e3896-2951-537f-e3d1-9954c93348dd@bobbriscoe.net> <67CBAA42-BD37-4A19-B650-68F511FC244A@gmx.de> <af3e6272-c04d-9e81-763c-e690ed521749@bobbriscoe.net> <1565A7C1-1DF1-4C6A-AC37-14331AC87508@gmail.com>
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <25e34532-5a33-3ca1-5cba-b7f857874ced@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 09:01:33 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1565A7C1-1DF1-4C6A-AC37-14331AC87508@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/U1QqTXBhVTMbmNCfqcDo5h8Gs6Q>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Gorry Fairhurst Individual thoughts on choosing whether/how to advance ECN work.
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 08:01:42 -0000

On 24/05/2020 05:21, Jonathan Morton wrote:
> I think I'll leave Paul and Sebastian to comment further in this vein.
>
>   - Jonathan Morton

If you decide to comment more, could you please finish that very quickly 
- the WG has decided to work on L4S.

There are topics that the WG needs to address, and I think this 
discussion is not helping the WG make progress.

Gorry

-- 
G. Fairhurst, School of Engineering

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email