IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Gorry Fairhurst Individual thoughts on choosing whether/how to advance ECN work.

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Sat, 16 May 2020 20:32 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D573A09A8 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 May 2020 13:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.052
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.052 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Etmy4bDm_XZd for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 May 2020 13:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com (mail-lf1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC3BD3A099E for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 May 2020 13:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id x22so1773887lfd.4 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 May 2020 13:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=EXq/dc4A7vI74kFeUnF03Q0txvz7SKqYOC+0MM1mqww=; b=fUSlugC9kNI5v/eBBF+G/X87FD6Hw2AxZbg7kvcNgaVScV59GTkM2e6Br8S1bbvjI8 hQ1cLONTyWThuVFhVcFHgkKgnxDuX/L4+h61jG+SFC2ZZsp7uhq1/8mChvcI3M0s6Ov9 urPs4/OCaSskFOSkvUoUqURJnC5FcnVXy9ym2SnIlkf9JsTUDaalHaUdevUU8j6UhwyP 28M7yylsp4fdA8L5Zvg+IM/yfG6gkRA70Myn+Xsc7UJ2RfHVSh3WRCRjKLI9a2UdUP8d 0SbIV7nbwetVcKnrYCVf7XsV2OQ/vIcKNS5C3/7UcWILK3ZY3swivMvhJaR847HeniZK g0hg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=EXq/dc4A7vI74kFeUnF03Q0txvz7SKqYOC+0MM1mqww=; b=WCMaPUj6zkBQQ/A1XD6fTD7m2W10jem9+vBXuu/sSNFn630I2WVHPKsA8RfjXGkmlH mPNcl9MggHlTgZENZFS7GGaNzZvXXsk07izM8gfeRFAJ6hx64Gy+7HRu4qyMWkTAznc4 q1gZj3KKpomrdgvDNLvpw14Fi+DKnx+dKS4MXrCRILCqb1BW614pfehe+2Wuu3a+fx92 b4UTbFnq8viZI6TbvclVlQTuaMfVXByXTjd3laQAKRfPztE74c/vwj6W3ptduMlIONav Sb6l57oK0MT1oi0zRY9k3Pu0rPRwMapvu6XY21ravu0DKQaKZf0sM0E7TbD45eL6v5Hq xyJA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53347WjSD2/NUKFAeZhPo/lKZSkweb23sXfXpDuMVEUMhuvo8L4x I8tV8qB0M4rmyoBZ7XWaNHVkL101
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzUH2ZT9XA6kRVlKpYwwFsI6Tvux8s6r5s8aGhtH2GfYRrJsAM0QSfhVL5IsamY4RN7xMlywg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:691:: with SMTP id t17mr6806466lfe.85.1589661152960; Sat, 16 May 2020 13:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (83-245-235-192-nat-p.elisa-mobile.fi. [83.245.235.192]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u24sm3184739ljl.28.2020.05.16.13.32.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 16 May 2020 13:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.5\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <399C8D41-AF1A-460A-B87C-F1F7C6EB0BCD@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 23:32:30 +0300
Cc: Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net>, Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2A38188E-1EF7-450F-A85D-5ED6F3E4B046@gmail.com>
References: <DDBA6185-1267-4CDA-BE77-550AA57446F5@gmail.com> <399C8D41-AF1A-460A-B87C-F1F7C6EB0BCD@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/hcdJO5bV0oLVGrnW3Re-mNzYvFQ>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Gorry Fairhurst Individual thoughts on choosing whether/how to advance ECN work.
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 20:32:36 -0000

> On 16 May, 2020, at 2:44 pm, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> I do not think this relates to the topics I raised in the subject line. You seem to have cut my points and started a new thread.

To be fair, I was just responding to Joe Touch.

I also think that the congestion safety questions he raised are central to the discussion as framed in your subject line.  I'm sure they would come up in later stages of IETF process anyway, as the security groups (for example) started to pay attention, and it's probably best to anticipate those objections beforehand.

 - Jonathan Morton

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email