Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141bis document

Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Mon, 29 October 2012 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F48421F86EA for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:04:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8CebDG5CrAx0 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com (mail-la0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEB221F8673 for <urn@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b11so4441700lam.31 for <urn@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=mk8YMyRwD1bwCOEf50sLQ2ABsbnYk+95WBYi7xZ12XE=; b=eq1FsHWyLm0Llr1smlpEZxizKV6FFLZPwWfDLrU4p8LIYvlxxgBk7rvHKz3tWExgCd ekgjohdYD7FwB02idXoHfMDu/HMv78+2SIWZ14XjMPTDZthE3G80HYwJ/GhSskOuHCZ8 /DD2cASZSA5ZHjlGVmbntC8awpyVL+nPJ5UFvHhu2b+sXE7Y9WydMZUyCk/lTl9Imb+P sYb/UhB6gZ0p9KC8UoDzE2YzjTpVMGSFak5zznDicF7zAvpffn/Dx2+qOAqOxh8yZfl6 +FD7YZ5vOHH1Uu0b6k4pkXY4DcV90Rz3TGUx2kAusWM3GG1Dok438LfEfx10h35FbeUz 6rBA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.38.234 with SMTP id j10mr11918697lbk.80.1351533849843; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.155.138 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [192.149.252.11]
In-Reply-To: <24637769D123E644A105A0AF0E1F92EFA3F8E0E2@dnbf-ex1.AD.DDB.DE>
References: <CAAQiQRe+wCBmKfm7up8XY-4RxLnktZiz+nuanprygGcHAYdqAw@mail.gmail.com> <24637769D123E644A105A0AF0E1F92EFA3F8E0E2@dnbf-ex1.AD.DDB.DE>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:04:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAQiQReAMAdP9Zhiexm5oGEE1uoNFZdZ+2ynUTwLXLeRnT_Bdw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
To: "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnOfiWlU+hwUPEbnwcKCh1jB4gghF+kn3tTZSJ9okNkzhlL01t5Zo5BsH6TJXrsNcdbRuur
Cc: "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141bis document
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:04:12 -0000

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de> wrote:
> As a compromise: Could it be an option to let the RFC focus on the technical implementation and to factor out the background information into a separate document and refer to it as a non-normative reference in the RFC?


Lars,

Yes, that is absolutely a possibility. Thanks for your comment.

-andy (co-chair)