IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Updating RFC 7084 - alternate logic

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 05 December 2022 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46230C1524C3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 08:12:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b2U47CCoG5Bp for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 08:12:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F1FC1524BF for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 08:12:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 2B5GCIFc046932; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 17:12:18 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DED2206989; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 17:12:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F23420697F; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 17:12:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.11.242.28] ([10.11.242.28]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 2B5GCGGQ054122; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 17:12:16 +0100
Message-ID: <0a63520c-9653-51e7-a766-416b7d3119d1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 17:12:16 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0
Content-Language: fr
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <CWXP123MB516311D9A5E90628BC8E8FD2D3149@CWXP123MB5163.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <DU0P190MB1978713EFCC2841F4B762F05FD149@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <5782557e-e2d8-48c0-b75c-d67d7e6cb228@gmail.com> <DU0P190MB19782F86F06A030BD9AC4836FD189@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <9169a670-1141-d688-fd7c-68f06c221378@gmail.com> <Y4313SQDIpYMfclu@Space.Net> <ee4c1b38-d25a-62e2-f815-71aa0e368b9e@gmail.com> <Y439HZAYY540zT2O@Space.Net> <868d2e96-0faf-7ba6-2432-7c31f3c44ba0@gmail.com> <848ec271-2183-bf3e-3004-4aa9a6bf9453@gmail.com> <Y44TxjkF6D9UsxPd@Space.Net>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Y44TxjkF6D9UsxPd@Space.Net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/4r99082EnWouumgFbhiFFPNX1NI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Updating RFC 7084 - alternate logic
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 16:12:19 -0000


Le 05/12/2022 à 16:52, Gert Doering a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 03:48:00PM +0100, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>> I correct myself: it _is_ possible to run DHCPv6-PD (and
>> DHCPv6-Addresses) across a non-DHCPv6 set of intermediary routers,
>> without a need to update the routing table entries of these intermediary
>> routers upon prefix allocation.   The secret lies in pre-configuring the
>> routing properlY.
> 
> If you preconfigure everything, you do not need DHCPv6-PD to get
> the prefix into place, so that is sort of a trivial excercise.

Ok, I meant to partially pre-configure.

But I agree that even that partial pre-configure of routing is too much 
to ask the typical home user.

I think that leaves out the use-case where there is some intermediary 
router between the stub router and the ISP's in-home router.

I am not sure if that makes sense from a business perspective.

Alex

> 
> Gert Doering
>          -- NetMaster

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email