IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] WG Doc? draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Fri, 18 March 2016 00:12 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E019412DDF8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mTXdNqKBijJP for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x233.google.com (mail-yw0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4310112DDF5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x233.google.com with SMTP id m126so96668209ywd.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xhqOxWJb5/mxeetHQtzYKatGL9rlVaORo65aGQDHdJs=; b=JwyOx1MYPSeLHQ4OK8PWRT0llNcpCH1gyTgOum1JT2fwd8HIn78CV5lqVkZo6cfpeT IVzCFMFJ2N1sWe1iAK5F5xR4+V+nIFz3dD/IJT7JBHJ+2eI7r6kEVgq8E18AB4MT1lNu OIzU9eZKB3x7Rc030XndMJMNq77fkV2S906tnHBAVfLsGcVbGSqo8QmfLkPCVSzddZBh Bcig+6i9RTvJLELTiPinFxLYpk6gu7+FIoaODtKHjnDwHUDmZkYMNHeFe9LAkOtF5BYv BbHz7q0wGhQE8JtQys2bvDXVBliidvwWvul4qKRSg0Rrz3LmetWLncHMgsggdc3Vt4HY Alkw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xhqOxWJb5/mxeetHQtzYKatGL9rlVaORo65aGQDHdJs=; b=gZZsfpd3+epowwu363iboNc7Jv+v30GX6E+qPU7vuVwigSf+WprTrDGhf9zau+ELWo cZLKsfvOQDkq8X9ruwoiMq9haMkrtAFIDAbk+Yt30p8TQqxEHEVf3d8wP7J1nVchIjWM uzF/swhUMrbtYWoG7466woaa9xMgiRHpmDIFRGoVdBnqI2foxPnL2B639+XAdDotfsQB nYaNhPddbitVHmjkyQePlxxJVQ6PrtbiGXTUzaJ6gC8lQCu/lAB8MUqx96fn0pcDH38Q OxkqfcZ9UHRhYrThaldgFSIBC0HKyqXPAiq8KO97boP7Mj63bsHopPtB5KC0OQruKADo 6bCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLa8otTH1qG+paB1WtnqOCAEy5tMEhRVC3tWoyX1Vdwo7hDY0zbLEbEmyTZCYVP1C7nEa9zEqLWPHtA5nFW
X-Received: by 10.13.205.199 with SMTP id p190mr6108619ywd.116.1458259976454; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.19.65 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <56EB2630.2020208@foobar.org>
References: <A277BE71-BD70-4AFE-97DA-F224D7DBBCB8@cisco.com> <CALx6S353ognNHWnjbNSdW5hb_e6Hv3LqLa_r+e9yEW4F=cjH=A@mail.gmail.com> <56E6FC18.1060304@foobar.org> <CALx6S35pcSj_LLnDWJ68KwSYiHeu6FwrXTaR4N2xE6aY7MRO1A@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iLbqEvsw0x4dDcA3Zy3SXKUROcQuy5nSynsL9Xi+xrZLg@mail.gmail.com> <566C93D0-62FF-4700-BC05-7F9AF12AF1BD@employees.org> <56E892B8.9030902@foobar.org> <394925FE-FAB1-4FFC-B1CF-4F64CC58F613@employees.org> <56E94275.20700@foobar.org> <3AE1DE20-D735-4262-A3FB-7C01F30BAFA2@employees.org> <56E96F74.7000206@foobar.org> <CALx6S37zP4UvCtBJsvnPN6OmDB0OQDMfRrJNy1XF0t4COStUjQ@mail.gmail.com> <EE17974D-EDA4-4732-B29E-B2B3BC36DB86@employees.org> <56E9A16B.4030605@si6networks.com> <A2634C00-EBF8-48DA-9604-790F5213F536@employees.org> <34E270CB-AEB4-4034-99B8-1E6AB528CF67@employees.org> <3AE9BA3C-E7B6-4C0F-B6B4-5A737485123D@employees.org> <56EB2630.2020208@foobar.org>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:12:36 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3Rv9vS77Ay6Q36WbNC9Lkez8z91dcUvz+26AzZnHzR=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114e5eb6e378a7052e479bb2"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/DEPdufU2r8gTdF_N6mJQFKTIEg0>
Cc: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] WG Doc? draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:12:59 -0000

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:48 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:

> none of "unknown" L4 headers, L4 encryption or tunnels are subject to
> the catastrophic levels of packet loss as measured in
> draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world.


And this is a protocol problem because...? IPv4 protocols other than TCP,
UDP and ICMP are probably subject to even more catastrophic loss than
extension headers, but we're not talking about fixing them.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email