IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] WG Doc? draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 11 March 2016 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F5C12DAA1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:13:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eq8OX2H0-cBR for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:13:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22e.google.com (mail-pa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D8B212DAB0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:13:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id fl4so106207860pad.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:13:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YBSAe+gJsjkJgRWG06/T+sALUw8Cu6I6SZnXLPB0XVA=; b=Cupj3EbjkqQRTmMX/8LOe9HT4rkTiN6XtW/3Pr8zdONlTEjsrJbEptZYJQbxeTxm2h VNHQEdnhbu42YHoSs+XEEvU0UxSyuVqU+mO7djo1WdQQvb4zs7eDUD+nqHd1NmOGTZyb Jw952oa+mqKn3O1aNTDokuVBC+wM1eVoSnhBUKcsmCCg+qiFFRvNyBN5vCrj68rySN0+ dJal+y/HEAoSiYqY/cxutILBipA4JKtYOzqR+ZlMAARqPO5hJ3DzJSr/6OKvpJpCT5z2 48Bx7G/0wrjq5OhBrqOz4AtPJnpVjL0dgfa/tGqtSPZmGma4Vm6AayqwJUACSVlDP4g9 KBQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YBSAe+gJsjkJgRWG06/T+sALUw8Cu6I6SZnXLPB0XVA=; b=eNNukZm3aXeAY4UBcN0aYy/Cc6JyAVAJ4TFTdYXzY2f0N7/X1F06toEdc/Y8cxL5SY zgnUSS6oq0jeR2OWTjkBznePpRVPuhlbqx7vi8N/AWSrxUIiyemc/xP359XMIVT4b6Dp fddj/TzUk18r4EZVnK0ZWM2ONYIgJ2VRUqvvLXM6HDfJ6lOO6t2f2rdLdC/1DO6aH3Cu zweYUWl6Ab57bprsC9nWvRD+iKyX+7+CItFpBxoyumU4gb1bts2GH65z7JMHGk59YeFM rNKjV7u6kpAb0+Q6YRBdBq3Zh41jNREybL9OlFld6yGfAv/CxwVEEGZ1jg9Y82u7PC2n HGCw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLErfvp5nMV2QhwSrE1nL+uYAxfeJ2jMrQbkNhDaz6ug6X6JbS+FpTAydW11p67qA==
X-Received: by 10.66.246.234 with SMTP id xz10mr18129379pac.49.1457723583950; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:13:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:5476:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:5476:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u81sm14705934pfi.15.2016.03.11.11.13.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:13:03 -0800 (PST)
To: otroan@employees.org, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
References: <A277BE71-BD70-4AFE-97DA-F224D7DBBCB8@cisco.com> <BDA56C2D-788D-421C-B44A-1A29578F0F78@employees.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <56E318C7.5020200@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 08:13:11 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BDA56C2D-788D-421C-B44A-1A29578F0F78@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/D_CXclN8G2SFG-JyAe3rdLw_KjM>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] WG Doc? draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 19:13:06 -0000

I disagree with Ole. I think there is is useful factual information here
that should be published. "Solicit input from network operators and users
to identify operational issues with the IPv6 Internet" and "document IPv6
operational experience" are part of the WG charter.

The new "Future Work" section is also telling us that we aren't done yet
if we want to improve deployability.

    Brian

On 12/03/2016 02:01, otroan@employees.org wrote:
>> The authors of draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops would like v6ops to adopt draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops as a working group document. Yes or no?
> 
> No.
> 
> Abstract:
>    "This document summarizes the security and operational implications of
>    IPv6 extension headers, and attempts to analyze reasons why packets
>    with IPv6 extension headers may be dropped in the public Internet."
> 
> The reasons why packets are dropped, and the security / operational implications is already covered in some of the the numerous other documents on IPv6 EHs.
> 
> Best regards,
> Ole
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email