IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] WG Doc? draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 21 March 2016 06:09 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B81312D63B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 23:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c5FYpQWg32kS for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 23:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BAA712D55D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 23:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2032; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1458540579; x=1459750179; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=4NRiZSZAYYJ3cfuizMORCU2GbIhFGN0vzaMNVYCTzVQ=; b=Wcwineq0pjjHZqyR8rJn990nHPVtmwia4EP4ws5342RMGWU18ItHEx8M SK5yVH8cQmnSms00f4jhR9t8LVchgjpHKuDCU5YiKka6QzdTw8CKHezbV 2ga2usojdHlL4cahtb3BeE7ZrWAy8tR/wrDdc0NPhDK4u5Ps4zbpslA7v 0=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DZAgCOj+9W/4MNJK1egzNTcga6Hg6BbxcMhWoCgR44FAEBAQEBAQFkHAuEQQEBAQMBAQEBawsFCwIBCBguJwslAgQOBQ6IEQgOvhkBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQENBASIEQiCSYdngisFl1cBgx2BZm2IE48HjwUBHgFDg2VqAYkWfgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,370,1454976000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="250163647"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Mar 2016 06:09:38 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-012.cisco.com (xch-rcd-012.cisco.com [173.37.102.22]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u2L69cW2031905 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 06:09:38 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) by XCH-RCD-012.cisco.com (173.37.102.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 01:09:37 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) by XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 01:09:37 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops.all@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] WG Doc? draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops
Thread-Index: AQHRe3z+jjdZn/af1k6rS4wakEAZs59jzVQA
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 06:09:37 +0000
Message-ID: <F7DBB6D3-8744-461B-9D11-C06B559A43A1@cisco.com>
References: <A277BE71-BD70-4AFE-97DA-F224D7DBBCB8@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <A277BE71-BD70-4AFE-97DA-F224D7DBBCB8@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.117]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_17B13578-1259-465A-B27A-B4D1D48F7B80"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/vmrICwOqHIQjVaTNU6IvHlLeH9s>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] WG Doc? draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 06:09:41 -0000

After a week's debate, with 13 people posting, I am hard pressed to say that there is a consensus in support of the adoption of this draft.

> On Mar 11, 2016, at 2:01 AM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> The authors of draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops would like v6ops to adopt draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops as a working group document. Yes or no?
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-03
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-03.txt
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email