IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] WG Doc? draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops

otroan@employees.org Sat, 12 March 2016 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA9612D883 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 13:48:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=employees.org; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=otroan@employees.org header.d=employees.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9BUTX5vbG0Xa for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 13:47:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cowbell.employees.org (cowbell.employees.org [65.50.211.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F78C12D880 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 13:47:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cowbell.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E081BD789D; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 13:47:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id :references:to; s=selector1; bh=ViPQmOmZsbtJq8OIg2GOYjWF8Tw=; b= gBWAeBy2XLx2ndA25GPb0YhV9MIQf8nDktETIJHOahRAWFOhAW1zEfjoPHsO5iwG +mzR4F+vcyzB2ChnrqUKkMonI9xZGhZjaIdoBxG3CN7wQIOmAY0SMLC3XtG5mQVq lw2wnW0C7s6R8HLxSUe+gbXRP7oSApnOnyFfDpqrqko=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id :references:to; q=dns; s=selector1; b=Ffc1xK9Qn7jSj23LYc2lTiUDAq bnjDb2iiaaa3Cvbnj1LFkVN5p/G60GdB1YOfXmOleuDQFUJ5Po1N/GGNn1Jksq9z Sh/0raf8GMCGv0YDQ/kpi/iCl4gDgNa3pCXevVDlVHBYGvFxjgz+fG61Q0z+sJu/ rU1MQhkN9Kl9DPzm4=
Received: from h.hanazo.no (77.18.136.136.tmi.telenormobil.no [77.18.136.136]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EA64D7882; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 13:47:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by h.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451F81289353; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 22:47:51 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2B65BDB9-A554-4207-9BF2-F89AD0E8B9C9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
From: otroan@employees.org
In-Reply-To: <56E46B94.1040004@si6networks.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 22:47:50 +0100
Message-Id: <355ECDE7-13B5-43FB-9AA9-B465AB4F966D@employees.org>
References: <A277BE71-BD70-4AFE-97DA-F224D7DBBCB8@cisco.com> <BDA56C2D-788D-421C-B44A-1A29578F0F78@employees.org> <56E318C7.5020200@gmail.com> <F57DFD38-FC99-45AE-B41D-51B0565148B1@employees.org> <56E46B94.1040004@si6networks.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ZZUizMrc4uo86m1XQZlvl6wKDT8>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] WG Doc? draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 21:48:00 -0000

Fernando,

>> Let me offer the contrarian view.
>> 
>>> I disagree with Ole. I think there is is useful factual information
>>> here that should be published. "Solicit input from network
>>> operators and users to identify operational issues with the IPv6
>>> Internet" and "document IPv6 operational experience" are part of
>>> the WG charter.
>> 
>> I've read through the document one more time. Would you be able to
>> cite new and useful information in this document? That isn't already
>> described elsewhere...?
> 
> Quite a few times in this discussion you argued that when use of the
> Flow Label for ECMP is widely deployed, there would be no need for
> routers/middle-boxes to process the EH chain. Among other things, this
> document clarifies why that's not the case.

Sorry I don't get that, can you point that out to me?

Best regards,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email