IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call- "harmfully broad"?

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Wed, 11 February 2015 22:41 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3952B1A00D8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:41:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kW1fO2yWSaR3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:41:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 083361A00A8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:41:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8522000C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:41:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:41:22 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=x-sasl-enc:message-id:date:from :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s= smtpout; bh=NGcHVaVDDbY1Q+2OHj8Drndk7NI=; b=eXmjp/Bq5YNt2v22skYp RSCTiX39yZOoKv+9HTUeYV8ydj8PigWQbUqcEP3B4sZq46S18SNK0XYADU78ftYd 8mpSCGXW1gttubB7ev26ZPRwEakgPbD2PWyM3O1Bq39teyH3qyQrXxX2Unf968KZ Yn7G/DkF360joJ3RECPzhqM=
X-Sasl-enc: i0RqzaJadtYIMSvXBA4sIMyKQW1w/RPi2m3ft3kuGRyu 1423694482
Received: from [104.55.94.41] (unknown [104.55.94.41]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 698826800CA; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:41:22 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <54DBDA89.90605@network-heretics.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:41:13 -0500
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330049091C2@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CADhXe52o=Vxux1+G8_EXgE_-a3Mest_LD6Hzzqu=hDp3H++Ttw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADhXe52o=Vxux1+G8_EXgE_-a3Mest_LD6Hzzqu=hDp3H++Ttw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020200070907030900020703"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/SwIRsMJ9ajd-e31aQjJ1Ux4xTww>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call- "harmfully broad"?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:41:26 -0000

On 02/11/2015 12:51 PM, James Woodyatt wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 4:09 AM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com 
> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     Which items are not technically justified?
>
>
> Others may have other items that bug them, and additional items may 
> spring to my mind later if I put my mind to it, but I see no technical 
> justification to recommend a simple firewall by default for tethered 
> hosts according to RFC 6092. I consider that recommendation to be 
> actively harmful.
+1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email