Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share

"cb.list6" <cb.list6@gmail.com> Tue, 30 July 2013 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C7B11E81E4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jcT+kWctCjWl for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22f.google.com (mail-ob0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE4021F9E7E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id xn12so12060062obc.20 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ytJCCEjNkO5w1dsBCaDQsImTrWRmHQOy8/bRy7OYwAA=; b=p8z6WVuRiYhkmxh068fXBXFNb3hLPKXqsBJfwya/ynMlZfNqGsJd8U3hbT8GLtDxUQ D3qxFn0Sic6yKIZTr4EScuc+B6QzOhRsTWVbmTNXNYh8gU9tTE0sv0Y09anuvOacFb0c VyEWlFLaMzcmG6nh6fAzkkbvko8HSF3QxtopXtLLr6Ajx+y49ay+eSZY2U9jwUdqV3LT sdP08bilViFLJwMXavm9hWCpLW8klqeskEsNjOmZOqBeeNHk9DErx0It9rKrJ+l5GWD/ +wnAo6AQKKaJ47C9IBiPYeYTWExgRsTxQCKWiv14RMSbwEFDOjyI7H5Ue5aS7ye2hGru kBzg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.16.102 with SMTP id f6mr176664igd.41.1375193321720; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.147.102 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.147.102 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <12351.1375184644@sandelman.ca>
References: <12351.1375184644@sandelman.ca>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:08:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGSG7B=7sGtj0Xjxyh2g5MnMxiopuEUeqJ6LgD=G=zS=-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: "cb.list6" <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc0cf070547c04e2bb2559
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, Cameron.Byrne@t-mobile.com
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:08:43 -0000

On Jul 30, 2013 4:46 AM, "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>
>
> Cameron, which scenario does the Android AOSP use?

Aosp has not integrated this yet, but this implementation was submitted

http://dan.drown.org/android/clat/

Scenario 2 is  used. There is value in the device being able maintain
communication (sockets) while tethering is turned on and off. Voip is a
good example of something that should not bounce when tethering is turned on

> Are the concerns about applications caring about the prefix length real?
>

I was given feedback that some apps care, and it should be noted

> I sure prefer scenario 1.  I think that MIF-aware applications will be
> happier with two v6 addresses.
>
> (I think that privacy extensions are useless for a device/network which
likely
> has the same /64 all the time)
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>