IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [BOFChairs] Proposed IESG statement on referencing documents behind a paywall

"Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)" <Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com> Thu, 13 June 2019 09:26 UTC

Return-Path: <Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B91B120297 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 02:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Oc9sQ7pJD-h for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 02:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00176a04.pphosted.com (mx0a-00176a04.pphosted.com [67.231.149.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1C4B120289 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 02:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0047964.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0047964.ppops.net-00176a04. (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5D9NAxq001734 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 05:26:46 -0400
Received: from usaoamgip002.mail.tfayd.com ([173.213.212.136]) by m0047964.ppops.net-00176a04. with ESMTP id 2t08m4gd9q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 05:26:46 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO potemwp00033.mail.tfayd.com) ([10.40.78.204]) by usaoamgip002.mail.tfayd.com with ESMTP; 13 Jun 2019 05:23:52 -0400
Received: from potemwp00028.mail.tfayd.com (100.124.56.52) by potemwp00025.mail.tfayd.com (100.124.56.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.669.32; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 03:26:43 -0600
Received: from potemwp00029.mail.tfayd.com (100.124.56.53) by potemwp00028.mail.tfayd.com (100.124.56.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.669.32; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 03:26:42 -0600
Received: from potemwp00029.mail.tfayd.com ([100.124.56.53]) by potemwp00029.mail.tfayd.com ([100.124.56.53]) with mapi id 15.01.0669.032; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 03:26:42 -0600
From: "Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)" <Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
CC: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [BOFChairs] Proposed IESG statement on referencing documents behind a paywall
Thread-Topic: [BOFChairs] Proposed IESG statement on referencing documents behind a paywall
Thread-Index: AQHVIcocwMJDqB0pdEehaXxUGljK8A==
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 09:26:42 +0000
Message-ID: <CBB73348-465E-4616-B1E7-64DAE0317C70@nbcuni.com>
References: <7A67EAB1-08D4-4901-8A43-0563C64EBA1B@gmail.com> <E0E3667A-5994-48B3-9DBC-B9FBB1C31D33@nbcuni.com>, <20190613032950.va3pfta2jgzoticg@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20190613032950.va3pfta2jgzoticg@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-exclaimer-md-config: 47edc00f-f2d6-45ef-be83-8a353bd47e45
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-06-13_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=932 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906130073
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/5cnz0vqLf4KENWh043CXrFaaIPI>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 09:26:49 -0000

Hi 

> On Jun 12, 2019, at 11:30 PM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> 
> Any URL for this? ....

I hesitated even citing anything around the current directive because that situation is fluid and is best left to the lawyers for the different orgs to interpret and each org’s leaders to decide on the correct action for their situation.  It was not my intent to get into compliance discussions. My apology for citing it, I had thought it may move the use case I was trying to suggest from abstract theory and something that maybe needed to dealt with sooner.

A better version of my comment is:  There is an additional use case of  “pay wall with additional restrictions” that is beyond just “pay wall”.  It would apply when the cited standard was behind a membership access wall and the terms of membership has restrictions.

-Glenn

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email