Re: [EXTERNAL] [BOFChairs] Proposed IESG statement on referencing documents behind a paywall

"Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)" <Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com> Thu, 13 June 2019 01:50 UTC

Return-Path: <Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CB312004A for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 18:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oj9XW-TV78GI for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 18:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00176a04.pphosted.com (mx0a-00176a04.pphosted.com [67.231.149.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A82312001E for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 18:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0047964.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0047964.ppops.net-00176a04. (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5D1hU8d038316 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 21:50:33 -0400
Received: from usushmgip001.mail.tfayd.com ([216.178.109.235]) by m0047964.ppops.net-00176a04. with ESMTP id 2t08m4c8s1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 21:50:33 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO potemwp00013.mail.tfayd.com) ([10.40.33.204]) by usushmgip001.mail.tfayd.com with ESMTP; 12 Jun 2019 18:50:32 -0700
Received: from potemwp00029.mail.tfayd.com (100.124.56.53) by potemwp00025.mail.tfayd.com (100.124.56.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.669.32; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 19:50:31 -0600
Received: from potemwp00029.mail.tfayd.com ([100.124.56.53]) by potemwp00029.mail.tfayd.com ([100.124.56.53]) with mapi id 15.01.0669.032; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 19:50:31 -0600
From: "Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)" <Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
CC: "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [BOFChairs] Proposed IESG statement on referencing documents behind a paywall
Thread-Topic: [EXTERNAL] [BOFChairs] Proposed IESG statement on referencing documents behind a paywall
Thread-Index: AQHVIWpIxpNStMEsnUqpl9V2oZ5VA6aY0e+H
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 01:50:31 +0000
Message-ID: <E0E3667A-5994-48B3-9DBC-B9FBB1C31D33@nbcuni.com>
References: <7A67EAB1-08D4-4901-8A43-0563C64EBA1B@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7A67EAB1-08D4-4901-8A43-0563C64EBA1B@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-exclaimer-md-config: 47edc00f-f2d6-45ef-be83-8a353bd47e45
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-06-13_01:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=867 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906130012
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/QylEQo_7TNUA5hwUoqAnr84BAsg>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 01:50:38 -0000

Hi Suresh 

First,  This is a very rational way to deal with the issue. 

However, and I do hate to raise this, but some SDOs are now not only paywall restricting but restricting due to geo-political issues, do we need to also flag and warn about cited references that are blocked from regional or even organizational access?

For a practical example. CTA has blocked access to Huawei due to the BIS directive. 

In such a case the citation may not be avoidable, but it would seem appropriate to mark the reference as restricted from open world wide access. 

-glenn 

> On Jun 12, 2019, at 6:00 PM, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi chairs,
>  In the past we have dealt with a few drafts that have had normative references to paywalled documents and we have dealt with them on a case-by-case basis (usually during or after IETF last call). In order to get the working groups involved earlier in the process, the IESG is working on issuing a statement on how to deal with such drafts and we would greatly appreciate input from WG chairs on this topic. This is the proposed text of the statement
> 
> *** START TEXT ***
> 
> As described in Section 7.1 of RFC 2026, RFCs may have normative 
> references on external standards.
> 
> In some cases, however, those references are themselves not generally
> available (for instance, they might be accessible only after paying
> a fee). This can interfere both with the ability of implementers
> to implement the protocol as well as with the ability of the IETF
> community to review it.
> 
> In such cases:
> 
> 1. The WG MUST be explicitly informed of any such normative reference
> and the WG MUST reach consensus that it is acceptable. The 
> document shepherd MUST include this information in the shepherd 
> writeup.
> 
> 2. The reference MUST be explicitly noted as part of the IETF Last
> Call. If such a note is omitted, the last call MUST be repeated
> after including it.
> 
> *** END TEXT ***
> 
> Please go over this text and let me know if you have any concerns, comments, or additions by 2019/06/26. 
> 
> Thanks
> Suresh
> _______________________________________________
> BOFChairs mailing list
> BOFChairs@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bofchairs