Re: Follow up on disruptive person during IETF 119

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 22 March 2024 04:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D55C15108D; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hPAhtdYsLl3k; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76C1DC15108B; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dyas.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:1998:183d:bb4b:6aab:5819]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 503561F4A8; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 04:17:51 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: relay.sandelman.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=sandelman.ca header.i=@sandelman.ca header.b="m+rkFumY"; dkim-atps=neutral
Received: by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 893C0A190E; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:17:48 +1000 (AEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=dyas; t=1711081068; bh=pqUhL8BwfvDBj7J8fvZqGrnDddNGXSWo0sElagq+hG8=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-reply-to:References:Date:From; b=m+rkFumYZxg1IyJztYurPrl/99GL1P0VYGpRPDC6waEaQOveP+tqAo2HYYi6OBhLO vfc/mYAEGYQljbWNRcNvrxYxfgoH5+iFgFA4uLnGAQ6Yr1+Gg7MiwifHw08QKW+ZQx Dj1/jRRyDZ77YalR8wX36Snq3qqlP+YOpr0KTGvUQNP0VMmhpNS0ip1LwDxtUlukMz QpQgH20peNCidOAfOnTZ9qvanPTR8PThVYv6oiOhfI2f6FK+kqAHxf/0t3RLHNUArG oJcx9XZ7/gjsRVGQDoPtK7Ufgl0HRI1wcgd8L1elEvMe/cMfWDlH5oQ6ckja18Bkco rVtUU6HxnvJHA==
Received: from dyas (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E7CA0C77; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:17:48 +1000 (AEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
cc: IETF WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, Laura Nugent <lnugent@amsl.com>, team@meetecho.com
Subject: Re: Follow up on disruptive person during IETF 119
In-reply-to: <5F30A325-7A57-49C5-8FD9-B23ADE8D155B@ietf.org>
References: <5F30A325-7A57-49C5-8FD9-B23ADE8D155B@ietf.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> message dated "Fri, 22 Mar 2024 11:03:27 +1000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:17:48 +1000
Message-ID: <236634.1711081068@dyas>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/VPvQj9A7h3VUgefuCpSXKLGWZq0>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 04:17:59 -0000

Leaving all the CCs, but not sure I should.

Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> wrote:
    > 3.  For single session removal this new process can be invoked by a WG
    > chair (of the session) or an AD, contacting the Secretariat.

Does this mean an email to the secretariat?  OR is it a button?

For virtual interim meetings, we might well be in a timezone that is not 9-5 Pacific.
(sharing the pain!)

If it's a button, it needs to be unclickable, because OOPS.

    > Does this work for everyone?

Thank you.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*