Re: [107attendees] Where the action is, at virtual meetings ...

Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com> Fri, 27 March 2020 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: 107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA463A0E16; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1e9JNvwULx88; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:17:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [23.123.122.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85B833A0D46; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:17:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60D76214B; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:17:52 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id LLUfkmql9sQ2; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:17:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lx140e.htt-consult.com (unknown [192.168.160.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65DD762134; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:17:45 -0400 (EDT)
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: Carrick Bartle <cbartle891=40icloud.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Puneet Sood <puneets=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, 107attendees@ietf.org, IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <CAKKJt-eCsg4v2kawrDAYy3StYE=SEVDVQfqngZfO6PD0o1Tswg@mail.gmail.com> <CCA52B2C-A856-4814-83DF-58A012AB63BA@fugue.com> <CA+9_gVvSvdocYSsw-FEAFrAL8Fq--CQpRj2OFJfvUVx6PjBrTA@mail.gmail.com> <7316D61D-A962-4943-BF02-FC676D671219@icloud.com> <6c578ff5-2870-7b86-6590-7ab01f944376@htt-consult.com> <9F76E481-FAF1-4EB0-8F82-1CF296F99FBF@fugue.com> <6e19f35e-8da4-f63f-26d5-7b5e1be075fd@htt-consult.com> <9BFB58E6-2EE2-44C3-B04D-C45C21A4E99B@fugue.com>
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
Message-ID: <57092354-ff42-91fc-08b5-546364af6b4e@htt-consult.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:17:42 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9BFB58E6-2EE2-44C3-B04D-C45C21A4E99B@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------8302572D6C6F386F9E33242B"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/107attendees/F_LOKFt1vDLKGDqaMzHhyGgfNag>
Subject: Re: [107attendees] Where the action is, at virtual meetings ...
X-BeenThere: 107attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 107 attendees for official communication <107attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/107attendees>, <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/107attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:107attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/107attendees>, <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:17:56 -0000


On 3/27/20 2:09 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Mar 27, 2020, at 2:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz 
> <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com <mailto:rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>> wrote:
>> From email we SHOULD be able to bootstrap meeting use of Jabber (or 
>> some other chat facility).
>
> Yes, for those people who choose to ask and don’t just remain silent. 
>  If we make it point-and-click, that problem goes away, and we aren’t 
> wasting time helping people to learn how to jump through hoops.
>
point-and-click only works for special plugins like WebEx.  I can't 
point-and-click to send an email, as I have 4 email clients running at 
any time.  I have to right-click, copy, switch, open , and paste....

And each Jabber client is different in how it takes info to open a 
conversation.  Pidgin did not work with what was there.  So a lot of 
work will be needed here.  Maybe a new protocol?

It would be nice.

Oh and I kind of dread something like Etherpad in place of Jabber. All 
these interactive Web apps, like Github are CPU and bandwidth killers.