[107attendees] Where the action is, at virtual meetings ...

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 27 March 2020 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2173A0F93; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.078
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eXGDirTw5p3z; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:24:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CF933A0ECD; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id z23so8352304lfh.8; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2PV0A8oxsDFkQcgxpUUMnD5hnCI4mv7HW00U7ZLDsyA=; b=Muau6CuTkTGxmkE6HwX8Dp9IGFUTxG0DX0zIQcLXtLtAFdqVzw2tNUYhyDCkdC4dzL 1iMfDMR6/5KHPWR8e8S9MtJxppxgmkzEamC+sxv8GUb0PYioFpurb4kdi70QHzcT8C0k Vpvf5+fDSXRSK/1tBXfEtib2ufFZRMX11iKebUaeujH94WYrbBUx1XVcwlZ3YoEhqg24 ANj9TjdrQmTXBL82NgHyykY41ejGeOtV7ioBmpTyrNPb8mezXFxAJObyKgYjYc3y222i 6rH16mX8xMuEAPRkihR1/S8kISeLbA0kl01QEvHQYAHVSWkstaq7j1qXuaMRfBCHbLxr pdmQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2PV0A8oxsDFkQcgxpUUMnD5hnCI4mv7HW00U7ZLDsyA=; b=pEayeJR8PswA8BA5EWuog69jvaIaAtxVZmEBPYkEiVCJTUtpq5o3nroj1rG5+MInlH hgQGxKxDh73P0ZBfdr/Er9pRTBwzipcnOdvVvOSZCHPSbB4ZQ3m4ghkNcCAHXKR/iZkS HObAdPm75B47qu5ww8p0AMIW/SToDOO3MPaAVxvrWeoGwvXsJ2pYOH7MEbpzjJwsAVsH 0NWoQ8UTXwOFWe2+kgxtTtpOjF5SLPP5Hl/Q9/Ww6CT+68/57mSZP/VU3WJGhDSl0M84 Kk3M8LH5IXewBWMhVIKX/XwXHnJL4K1yDxeJ1Ei9WQF0If+1o9QkpuLU2hNY+8A0a7sk KlnA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYjSW1bTX7IACLOqcPyctSuV9BPQwFbfy0LvJ9mZ2S/r3PfyykO 6ZvS5sF3egKTNg6dRb9DUMHtp58qEn9i0nsG7OkQYA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI74zpyBKrUwKSIhWzhSZzizU+cjDs+dgmr8wqpHk3UBib2I8mU0EHf3qa/0/mcFqoR7f+4/1EoSaL5vvs6vus=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4433:: with SMTP id w19mr42653lfl.53.1585325896406; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:18:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:17:50 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-eCsg4v2kawrDAYy3StYE=SEVDVQfqngZfO6PD0o1Tswg@mail.gmail.com>
To: 107attendees@ietf.org
Cc: IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e89c5005a1d872b5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/107attendees/Ve6RjkTimP1TddfgojKiyqXZ1bA>
Subject: [107attendees] Where the action is, at virtual meetings ...
X-BeenThere: 107attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 107 attendees for official communication <107attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/107attendees>, <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/107attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:107attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/107attendees>, <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 16:25:00 -0000

I've heard almost every session chairs saying words like "we have X people
who have signed the bluesheets, and 2X people who are in WebEx now, please
go sign the bluesheet". So that's fine.

But I'm also noticing that there are about X people in Jabber, and
honestly, this week, the jabber rooms are incredibly active - probably
because they're playing the part of hallway discussions for each session.
That's been especially true for BOFs, but almost every session has had a
non-stop active jabber room for most/all of the session.

There are a lot of conversations there, that aren't making it into the mike
line, so roughly half the people in WebEx aren't seeing them, and in the
cases I'm familiar with, the jabber conversation has been at least as
well-informed and serious as the voice conversation. And the voice
conversation doesn't always end up in the same place as the jabber
conversation.

Are other people noticing the same thing?

Best,

Spencer