IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] New Version Notification for draft-shelby-exi-registration-01.txt

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Tue, 24 April 2012 10:41 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A6021F864A for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.442
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.442 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.864, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qI2AF6El8HUs for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com [209.65.160.86]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A4E21F8584 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [144.160.20.145] (EHLO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) by nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-6.11.0-8) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 053869f4.0.643191.00-436.1765881.nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com (envelope-from <tony@att.com>); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:41:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 4f968351791238b2-25393859e196baae12733ed1c0d50d3edc216d3f
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3OAfK6I009291 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:41:20 -0400
Received: from sflint02.pst.cso.att.com (sflint02.pst.cso.att.com [144.154.234.229]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3OAfEMl009263 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:41:14 -0400
Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by sflint02.pst.cso.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:40:39 -0400
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3OAedBA002447 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:40:39 -0400
Received: from mailgw1.maillennium.att.com (mailgw1.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3OAeWeP002354 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:40:33 -0400
Received: from [135.70.94.94] (vpn-135-70-94-94.vpn.swst.att.com[135.70.94.94]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20120424103722gw1004or07e> (Authid: tony); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:37:22 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.94.94]
Message-ID: <4F96831F.6030004@att.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:40:31 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: "apps-discuss@ietf.org application-layer protocols" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <20120329204732.13711.266.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5580A282-E191-4962-9410-6CF9FB14EDFC@sensinode.com> <DEB40F4C-7922-4CB5-8A2E-C1C4B6BAFC48@iii.ca> <6CCF89EF-B173-4FBD-96F8-5D4C161FFC28@tzi.org> <4F95D22A.6060500@stpeter.im> <01OEO1DMECF40006TF@mauve.mrochek.com>
In-Reply-To: <01OEO1DMECF40006TF@mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010505000500000907040008"
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-RSA-Action: allow
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <tony@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.20.145]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=N7jmR7O6mG8A:10 a=vnNYxAp2wzwA:10 a=I33QWX3c-g]
X-AnalysisOut: [EA:10 a=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=ZRNLZ4dFUbCvG8]
X-AnalysisOut: [UMqPvVAA==:17 a=LU1XTwNGdYoCQVZclEQA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=9aueKP-jAAAA:8 a=Jy1sZ59xldrHFTZWp1IA:9 a=rDUDItsgqzm60re]
X-AnalysisOut: [aVSIA:7 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10]
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] New Version Notification for draft-shelby-exi-registration-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:41:22 -0000

On 4/23/2012 9:14 PM, Ned Freed wrote:
>> On 4/23/12 2:28 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>>> My 5-line summary is:
> ...
>> Although it's not beautiful, I can see why we've ended up at #3 and it
>> seems like the least-worst solution at this point.
> I have to agree. For better or worse, we didn't think about this case when the
> architecture was designed. And as we all know, adding mandatory-to-implement
> information fields after the fact doesn't work very well (if at all). So this
> is where we end up.

Thanks for the summary Carsten. I think you captured the discussion very 
well.

     Tony Hansen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email