Re: [apps-discuss] New Version Notification for draft-shelby-exi-registration-01.txt

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Mon, 23 April 2012 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9124621F859A for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.975
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.975 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.580, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=0.044, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PGLcg3F8LeyC for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fallback-in2.mxes.net (fallback-out2.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0582A21F8734 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by fallback-in1.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E34C2FDC5D for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:29:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sjc-vpn7-1727.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.239.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7353F22E25E; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:28:59 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <5580A282-E191-4962-9410-6CF9FB14EDFC@sensinode.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:57:00 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DEB40F4C-7922-4CB5-8A2E-C1C4B6BAFC48@iii.ca>
References: <20120329204732.13711.266.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5580A282-E191-4962-9410-6CF9FB14EDFC@sensinode.com>
To: Zach Shelby <zach@sensinode.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org application-layer protocols" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] New Version Notification for draft-shelby-exi-registration-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:29:08 -0000

So what was the summary of the discussion on this? Other than clarifying draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs, anything decided? Any changes I need to make to senml registrations?

On Mar 29, 2012, at 13:52 , Zach Shelby wrote:

> I have posted a new version of the +exi registration draft. This version improves the Interoperability considerations of the registration requirements and further clarifies when this suffix may be used, as per the feedback on the list from Carine and others.
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-shelby-exi-registration-01.txt
> 
> Regards,
> Zach
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
>> Date: March 29, 2012 10:47:32 PM GMT+02:00
>> To: zach@sensinode.com
>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-shelby-exi-registration-01.txt
>> 
>> A new version of I-D, draft-shelby-exi-registration-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Zach Shelby and posted to the IETF repository.
>> 
>> Filename:	 draft-shelby-exi-registration
>> Revision:	 01
>> Title:		 The +exi Media Type Suffix
>> Creation date:	 2012-03-29
>> WG ID:		 Individual Submission
>> Number of pages: 5
>> 
>> Abstract:
>> Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) is an XML representation technique
>> specified by the W3C to provie a binary alternative to the standard
>> text XML representation.  This document defines a new Structure
>> Syntax Suffix &quot;+exi&quot; for use in a specific class of protocols, where
>> &quot;exi&quot; content-type encoding or the generic &quot;application/exi&quot; Media
>> Type are not applicable.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> -- 
> Zach Shelby, Chief Nerd, Sensinode Ltd.
> http://www.sensinode.com
> http://zachshelby.org  - My blog "On the Internet of Things"
> http://6lowpan.net - My book "6LoWPAN: The Wireless Embedded Internet"
> Mobile: +358 40 7796297
> 
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss