IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-shelby-exi-registration-01.txt

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 11 April 2012 23:05 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7CF11E80FA for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.44
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.191, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RpcSLtE-iIAn for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0066F11E80EA for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3BN5kXT018432; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 01:05:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.105] (p5489ADE7.dip.t-dialin.net [84.137.173.231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DBC65C4; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 01:05:46 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <01OE6QSJQ2EW00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 01:05:45 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <42487F00-DE42-49AA-9E4C-23412504C70A@tzi.org>
References: <20120329204732.13711.266.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5580A282-E191-4962-9410-6CF9FB14EDFC@sensinode.com> <20120402124522.GX16698@jay.w3.org> <8B84EAAD-CD22-4461-9BC6-AB78974A94A2@sensinode.com> <20120411075024.GN18899@jay.w3.org> <4F85410D.20802@toshiba.co.jp> <20120411085920.GP18899@jay.w3.org> <FBCADBF9-D6FB-4E0D-9668-F5B3EF744037@tzi.org> <f5bobqye1vj.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk> <4F85A3A2.9000505@gmx.de> <01OE6QSJQ2EW00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-shelby-exi-registration-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:05:54 -0000

On Apr 11, 2012, at 17:57, Ned Freed wrote:

> And if this is the case, it really isn't suitable for a +exi suffix either.
> +exi is supposed to mean the format can at least be parsed,  independent of any
> knowledge of the type semantics. This is why I support the idea of having +ber
> and +der but not +per - with +per you have to know the ASN.1 schema in order to
> parse the material properly.

So how would you handle the PERs and (schema-informed) EXIs of this world?
Should it be -exi, not +exi?

(As in application/senml-exi?)

(Again, the media type registration will do a lot more than just tack EXI encoding on existing XML.)

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email