IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-shelby-exi-registration-01.txt

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 11 April 2012 20:43 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBCC11E80B8 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.529
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.529 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.280, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HpuNlhYVitne for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B34011E8075 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3BKh8hG001148; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:43:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.105] (p5489ADE7.dip.t-dialin.net [84.137.173.231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 468FE59D; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:43:08 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120411164447.GA24351@jay.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:43:07 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4DDB792A-4154-4C7B-A3EC-82573FE20D3E@tzi.org>
References: <20120329204732.13711.266.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5580A282-E191-4962-9410-6CF9FB14EDFC@sensinode.com> <20120402124522.GX16698@jay.w3.org> <8B84EAAD-CD22-4461-9BC6-AB78974A94A2@sensinode.com> <20120411075024.GN18899@jay.w3.org> <4F85410D.20802@toshiba.co.jp> <20120411085920.GP18899@jay.w3.org> <FBCADBF9-D6FB-4E0D-9668-F5B3EF744037@tzi.org> <20120411164447.GA24351@jay.w3.org>
To: Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-shelby-exi-registration-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:43:21 -0000

On Apr 11, 2012, at 18:44, Carine Bournez wrote:

> If you use the content-encoding and the original media type, let's say svg,
> then the schema is the svg schema. There is absolutely no issue in that case.
> If foo has an application/foo media type for which the schema is known, 
> the application readily knows which schema to use when receiving the EXI
> stream with the content-encoding header.

Ah, SVG actually is a great example for why I think there need to be separate +exi registrations.

So, for image/svg+xml (see http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/mimereg.html), what is "the SVG schema"?

What values of schemaId are defined, and what do they point to?

What about "application/svg+xml"?  “application/vnd.oipf.dae.svg+xml”?

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email