Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter proposal

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Fri, 05 April 2013 19:02 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C231E21F98A1 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 12:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.501, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W4wn8Bdj9qa3 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 12:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC36D21F98A6 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 12:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r35J2eQQ021314 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 5 Apr 2013 12:02:41 -0700
Message-ID: <515F1FCA.6030809@bbiw.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 12:02:34 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <CAL0qLwYc757fw_VhPMHDrgcCimNFak02brDRLAVTq+NR4w34pA@mail.gmail.com> <5159D7A4.4000701@cs.tcd.ie> <CAL0qLwa0JtksC7iE_noz_ZC1L-NQU1EyH1X=dcrkPL-4UWJ-yA@mail.gmail.com> <515A0895.2090209@cs.tcd.ie> <515A1581.9030402@dcrocker.net> <515A2464.8090401@cs.tcd.ie> <515B2E1D.4050102@dcrocker.net> <515B401B.3070809@cs.tcd.ie> <CAC4RtVASwR=7Qvz9iY5GMzOAkEHnS-TjoROEE1JQpzX_X-JLHA@mail.gmail.com> <515F0F49.4090107@dcrocker.net> <CALaySJ+O=cdDLtqB16Rf4HKvA+MO4Z36UTCVE=-3_jP=P2uuog@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+O=cdDLtqB16Rf4HKvA+MO4Z36UTCVE=-3_jP=P2uuog@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Fri, 05 Apr 2013 12:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter proposal
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 19:02:52 -0000

On 4/5/2013 11:16 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> NEW
> The working group will capture feedback about possible extensions to
> the DMARC specification, and provide it for any future effort.  Such
> extensions and accommodation of additional use cases are out of scope
> for this working group.
> END


Speaking as a voice of one:  wfm.  Thanks!

What do others think of it?

d/

-- 
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net