Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports
Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Wed, 20 May 2020 18:54 UTC
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD803A0FD2 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2020 11:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eXoPIfy8HBUs for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2020 11:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B55E3A0FD1 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 May 2020 11:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7CF1D21500; Wed, 20 May 2020 11:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org, iab-chair@iab.org
References: <158920530782.23655.6622928751672901506@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512152625.124c1588@elandnews.com> <d798d383-9bab-50f8-b6ee-dabb9cc37c2a@cs.tcd.ie> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512162358.0b239160@elandnews.com> <4548adba-834c-bfdd-36af-66b367408df8@cs.tcd.ie> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512191150.0bafa9a0@elandnews.com> <9161f68e-f51b-f97b-fc2b-372d24404209@cs.tcd.ie> <CAL0qLwZQxM+eDeZ+zFw3Gny7sy=jXi-1aUvE1B2RuO=M5CP_Sw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512232644.0d9328c8@elandnews.com> <CALaySJKs9oLXBN_UVq=Mn5ZefvrSgPyrV1J=1NMA0=YVDRnJVA@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200513081326.0ababe28@elandnews.com> <CALaySJKG7+g7u4p92axbZx4AxhwZgNfgfeHhE708EVpLs+iJjQ@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200513101502.0b0c7c90@elandnews.com> <CALaySJ++dWefRF5rbc0Fxp6wAFWJJH0rMt9u_5gv9BxN2adKbw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200513140922.0aebf148@elandnews.com> <ybld077uw6f.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20200513212345.0afe2f10@elandnews.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 11:54:46 -0700
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20200513212345.0afe2f10@elandnews.com> (S. Moonesamy's message of "Wed, 13 May 2020 21:29:34 -0700")
Message-ID: <yblh7wafnd5.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/8foD-8fS0aTOCVIpHO6eN_MTEjA>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 18:54:55 -0000
S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> writes: > Hi Wes, > At 06:44 PM 13-05-2020, Wes Hardaker wrote: > >The IAB liason reports are published as part of the IAB minutes: > > Thank you for the example. May I ask what happened to the past > liaison management reports (please see the link which I mentioned in > my request)? I think someone already answered you, but I don't see it in the response thread, so just to be absolutely certain your question doesn't go unanswered: the iab website did indeed have a bug wrt liason statements being listed in the menu and is now fixed. https://www.iab.org/liaisons/liaison-mgr-reports/ -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI
- Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… Barry Leiba
- Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… Barry Leiba
- Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… Barry Leiba
- [arch-d] Liaison reports (was: Domain-based Messa… S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports Wes Hardaker
- Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports Guntur Wiseno Putra
- Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports Guntur Wiseno Putra
- Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports (was: Domain-based M… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports (was: Domain-based M… S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports (was: Domain-based M… Bob Hinden
- Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports (was: Domain-based M… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports Wes Hardaker
- Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports Wes Hardaker
- Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports (was: Domain-based M… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports Mirja Kuehlewind