IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cats] CATS WG Adoption poll for draft-ldbc-cats-framework

Cheng Li <c.l@huawei.com> Mon, 26 February 2024 10:15 UTC

Return-Path: <c.l@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: cats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250EBC15109A; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 02:15:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id onz78vFa8kIO; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 02:15:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29F4BC14F739; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 02:14:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TjxFJ6106z6K6CH; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:10:12 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml100005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.160.25]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07B57140A08; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:14:31 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) by lhrpeml100005.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 10:14:30 +0000
Received: from dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.56) by dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:14:27 +0800
Received: from dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.56]) by dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.56]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.035; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:14:27 +0800
From: Cheng Li <c.l@huawei.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, 'cats' <cats@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ldbc-cats-framework@ietf.org" <draft-ldbc-cats-framework@ietf.org>, "cats-chairs@ietf.org" <cats-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: CATS WG Adoption poll for draft-ldbc-cats-framework
Thread-Index: AdpmdjfuYgJOeHzERbaqW70ldzhSIACJUjDw
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 10:14:27 +0000
Message-ID: <179d288de5e6434696b539fe401e545c@huawei.com>
References: <01ab01da6677$86be97f0$943bc7d0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <01ab01da6677$86be97f0$943bc7d0$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.221.205.154]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cats/O9MxNWferrZ0S4OOP4LSTuXX8uQ>
Subject: Re: [Cats] CATS WG Adoption poll for draft-ldbc-cats-framework
X-BeenThere: cats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Computing-Aware Traffic Steering \(CATS\)" <cats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cats>, <mailto:cats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cats/>
List-Post: <mailto:cats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cats>, <mailto:cats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 10:15:12 -0000

Yes, I support the adoption for sure as an author. Thank you for issuing the adoption call.

Yes, I have reviewed the document, many times. I believe that the content is quite mature. However, we need more critical discussion on the text, and more contributions from the WG to enhance the details of the draft.
Yes, I have some comments of the draft, for example function 3.3 need more text to describe the overview more clear. The remaining issues in the github repo should be addressed, and the one regarding security part should be handled. 
Yes, I believe this document can meet the milestone. Because the document clearly describe the framework of CATS, it reflects the discussion and consensus in CATS WG very well. 

Respect,
Cheng



-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> 
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2024 5:44 PM
To: 'cats' <cats@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ldbc-cats-framework@ietf.org; cats-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: CATS WG Adoption poll for draft-ldbc-cats-framework

Hi CATS,

We have had IPR disclosure responses from all authors and contributors.
All but one have indicated "no IPR", with the remaining one stating that there is IPR, but the company is doing a detailed analysis before filing a disclosure.

The working group has a milestone for "Adopt the CATS Framework and Architecture document"

So, we are going to start a two week adoption poll for the draft. This will end on 9th March at 9am GMT.

Please state your opinions on whether or not this document should be adopted. Authors and Contributors are also welcome to state their opinions.
Recall that the document does not have to be perfect at this point: we are looking for a starting point that can be taken up by the WG and edited until it is complete and ready.

A simple yes or no is helpful, but doesn't carry much weight.

So, if "yes":
- have you reviewed the document?
- do you have any comments or editorial suggestions?
- do you think this is the right document to meet the milestone?
- why do you think this is a good document?

And, if "no":
- what are your concerns?
- what is your proposal to meet the milestone?

If the current IPR situation is a significant concern to you, you are welcome to state that.

Thanks,
Adrian (for the chairs)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email