Re: [Cats] CATS WG Adoption poll for draft-ldbc-cats-framework

[LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <[e-mail]>]

Hi Adrian, all,

As co-author, yes, I support adoption. Regarding the questions:

- have you reviewed the document? [Luis>] Sure
- do you have any comments or editorial suggestions? [Luis] When exercising the framework with the midhaul scenario (documented in draft-lcmw-cats-midhaul) I realize that in some cases cannot be necessary the service identifier for the service access processing. Probably this could be clarified in the draft. It can be probably require more text on how the traffic classifiers can enforce the delivery of the flows on the selected path (high-level, since particularities can come in solutions drafts). Finally I have detected some typos (I think) in the current version that I will signal in the github.
- do you think this is the right document to meet the milestone? [Luis>] Yes
- why do you think this is a good document? [Luis>] Yes

Best regards

Luis


-----Mensaje original-----
De: Adrian Farrel <[e-mail]>
Enviado el: viernes, 23 de febrero de 2024 17:44
Para: 'cats' <[e-mail]>
CC: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Asunto: CATS WG Adoption poll for draft-ldbc-cats-framework

Hi CATS,

We have had IPR disclosure responses from all authors and contributors.
All but one have indicated "no IPR", with the remaining one stating that there is IPR, but the company is doing a detailed analysis before filing a disclosure.

The working group has a milestone for "Adopt the CATS Framework and Architecture document"

So, we are going to start a two week adoption poll for the draft. This will end on 9th March at 9am GMT.

Please state your opinions on whether or not this document should be adopted. Authors and Contributors are also welcome to state their opinions.
Recall that the document does not have to be perfect at this point: we are looking for a starting point that can be taken up by the WG and edited until it is complete and ready.

A simple yes or no is helpful, but doesn't carry much weight.

So, if "yes":
- have you reviewed the document?
- do you have any comments or editorial suggestions?
- do you think this is the right document to meet the milestone?
- why do you think this is a good document?

And, if "no":
- what are your concerns?
- what is your proposal to meet the milestone?

If the current IPR situation is a significant concern to you, you are welcome to state that.

Thanks,
Adrian (for the chairs)


________________________________

Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is confidential and privileged information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição