Re: [Cats] CATS WG Adoption poll for draft-ldbc-cats-framework

"yanghongwei@chinamobile.com" <yanghongwei@chinamobile.com> Wed, 28 February 2024 10:57 UTC

Return-Path: <yanghongwei@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: cats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBBAC14F5FF; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 02:57:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XsENt2zgEE8S; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 02:57:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta8.chinamobile.com [111.22.67.151]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3F2C14F5FB; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 02:57:14 -0800 (PST)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[10.188.0.87]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app02-12002 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee265df1188dda-36109; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 18:57:12 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee265df1188dda-36109
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from CMCC (unknown[10.2.147.88]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr03-12003 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee365df1187a89-d0013; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 18:57:12 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee365df1187a89-d0013
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 18:57:12 +0800
From: "yanghongwei@chinamobile.com" <yanghongwei@chinamobile.com>
To: adrian <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, 'cats' <cats@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ldbc-cats-framework@ietf.org" <draft-ldbc-cats-framework@ietf.org>, "cats-chairs@ietf.org" <cats-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <01ab01da6677$86be97f0$943bc7d0$@olddog.co.uk>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: 3899E813-2FBA-4C4F-9C1A-C11308DAA770
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.25.148[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <202402281857121492886@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart070825463162_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cats/Rl4aph2B1voXxcn-Z7Ywv9KnvQo>
Subject: Re: [Cats] CATS WG Adoption poll for draft-ldbc-cats-framework
X-BeenThere: cats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Computing-Aware Traffic Steering \(CATS\)" <cats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cats>, <mailto:cats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cats/>
List-Post: <mailto:cats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cats>, <mailto:cats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 10:57:21 -0000

Hi, WG,

I have read the draft, it's well written and mature enough to be adopted. 

Hongwei.



yanghongwei@chinamobile.com
 
From: Adrian Farrel
Date: 2024-02-24 00:44
To: 'cats'
CC: draft-ldbc-cats-framework@ietf.org; cats-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [Cats] CATS WG Adoption poll for draft-ldbc-cats-framework
Hi CATS,
 
We have had IPR disclosure responses from all authors and contributors.
All but one have indicated "no IPR", with the remaining one stating that
there is IPR, but the company is doing a detailed analysis before filing a
disclosure.
 
The working group has a milestone for "Adopt the CATS Framework and
Architecture document"
 
So, we are going to start a two week adoption poll for the draft. This will
end on 9th March at 9am GMT.
 
Please state your opinions on whether or not this document should be
adopted. Authors and Contributors are also welcome to state their opinions.
Recall that the document does not have to be perfect at this point: we are
looking for a starting point that can be taken up by the WG and edited until
it is complete and ready.
 
A simple yes or no is helpful, but doesn't carry much weight.
 
So, if "yes":
- have you reviewed the document?
- do you have any comments or editorial suggestions?
- do you think this is the right document to meet the milestone?
- why do you think this is a good document?
 
And, if "no":
- what are your concerns?
- what is your proposal to meet the milestone?
 
If the current IPR situation is a significant concern to you, you are
welcome to state that.
 
Thanks,
Adrian (for the chairs)
 
-- 
Cats mailing list
Cats@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cats