Re: [Cats] CATS WG Adoption poll for draft-ldbc-cats-framework

"yaohuijuan@chinamobile.com" <yaohuijuan@chinamobile.com> Thu, 29 February 2024 02:39 UTC

Return-Path: <yaohuijuan@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: cats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3AF8C14CE44; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 18:39:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ua5D4PhMMaW6; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 18:39:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmccmta3.chinamobile.com (cmccmta6.chinamobile.com [111.22.67.139]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBC7C14CF1F; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 18:38:53 -0800 (PST)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[10.188.0.87]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app09-12009 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee965dfee3c4a3-264a6; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:38:52 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee965dfee3c4a3-264a6
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from LAPTOP-0963S9S1 (unknown[10.2.52.38]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr03-12003 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee365dfee3ab74-5e3f5; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:38:52 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee365dfee3ab74-5e3f5
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:38:52 +0800
From: "yaohuijuan@chinamobile.com" <yaohuijuan@chinamobile.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, cats <cats@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ldbc-cats-framework@ietf.org" <draft-ldbc-cats-framework@ietf.org>, "cats-chairs@ietf.org" <cats-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <01ab01da6677$86be97f0$943bc7d0$@olddog.co.uk>, <179d288de5e6434696b539fe401e545c@huawei.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: B86EA494-8354-4FB2-98CD-963DD227E040
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.23.116[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2024022910385231041011@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart576555245708_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cats/XFQAwKMn0V6xRp-TXZM-8ix7qVo>
Subject: Re: [Cats] CATS WG Adoption poll for draft-ldbc-cats-framework
X-BeenThere: cats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Computing-Aware Traffic Steering \(CATS\)" <cats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cats>, <mailto:cats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cats/>
List-Post: <mailto:cats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cats>, <mailto:cats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 02:39:04 -0000

Hi CATS,
      
    I support the adoption.  As a contributor,I have reviewed the document, many times. I believe that the content is becoming increasingly comprehensive. However, we need more critical discussion on the text, and  content details of the draft. 
 In addtion,  I have some comments of the draft.   for example section 3.3 need more text to describe the overview more clear.   section  3.4 needs  to supplement  the description o for the newly added components in the corresponding 3.3 architecture section.   I believe this document about the framework and architecture job  can meet the milestone through  more contributuons. 

Thanks,
huijuan 



yaohuijuan@chinamobile.com
 
From: Cheng Li
Date: 2024-02-26 18:14
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk; 'cats'
CC: draft-ldbc-cats-framework@ietf.org; cats-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Cats] CATS WG Adoption poll for draft-ldbc-cats-framework

 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> 
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2024 5:44 PM
To: 'cats' <cats@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ldbc-cats-framework@ietf.org; cats-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: CATS WG Adoption poll for draft-ldbc-cats-framework
 
Hi CATS,
 
We have had IPR disclosure responses from all authors and contributors.
All but one have indicated "no IPR", with the remaining one stating that there is IPR, but the company is doing a detailed analysis before filing a disclosure.
 
The working group has a milestone for "Adopt the CATS Framework and Architecture document"
 
So, we are going to start a two week adoption poll for the draft. This will end on 9th March at 9am GMT.
 
Please state your opinions on whether or not this document should be adopted. Authors and Contributors are also welcome to state their opinions.
Recall that the document does not have to be perfect at this point: we are looking for a starting point that can be taken up by the WG and edited until it is complete and ready.
 
A simple yes or no is helpful, but doesn't carry much weight.
 
So, if "yes":
- have you reviewed the document?
- do you have any comments or editorial suggestions?
- do you think this is the right document to meet the milestone?
- why do you think this is a good document?
 
And, if "no":
- what are your concerns?
- what is your proposal to meet the milestone?
 
If the current IPR situation is a significant concern to you, you are welcome to state that.
 
Thanks,
Adrian (for the chairs)
 
-- 
Cats mailing list
Cats@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cats