Re: Polling for new WG IDs

JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com> Fri, 01 December 2006 12:49 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gq7pb-000843-QQ for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 07:49:31 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gq7pZ-0001RU-BQ for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 07:49:31 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1Gq7ei-000IB7-8m for ccamp-data@psg.com; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:38:16 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.1.7
Received: from [171.68.10.86] (helo=sj-iport-4.cisco.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <jvasseur@cisco.com>) id 1Gq7eK-000I9o-Jv for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:38:06 +0000
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2006 04:37:50 -0800
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kB1CboUC008580; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 07:37:50 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id kB1CboDM024776; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 07:37:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 07:37:50 -0500
Received: from [10.86.104.179] ([10.86.104.179]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 07:37:49 -0500
In-Reply-To: <449B2580D802A443A923DABF3EAB82AF0D36F9E9@OCCLUST04EVS1.ugd.att.com>
References: <449B2580D802A443A923DABF3EAB82AF0D36F9E9@OCCLUST04EVS1.ugd.att.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-15--161609429"
Message-Id: <DF521960-4573-4434-92EA-CD7B9B7FD15D@cisco.com>
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
From: JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Polling for new WG IDs
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 07:37:47 -0500
To: "Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Dec 2006 12:37:49.0532 (UTC) FILETIME=[82D5B9C0:01C71545]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=4003; t=1164976670; x=1165840670; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jvasseur@cisco.com; z=From:=20JP=20Vasseur=20<jvasseur@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Polling=20for=20new=20WG=20IDs |Sender:=20 |To:=20=22Brungard,=20Deborah=20A,=20ALABS=22=20<dbrungard@att.com>; bh=dKQjn3X1TIBeyvselDhCZM1QdvIAEuMaza4XriQu1w0=; b=rU3QI8Mxc+t8h//Z9VwENSk+VWRoUrKgq4bFsb7HQ1oCpeN5kltWy4PO6SuzD+o1F8ep+xYt oLJ2f9SjJOv1yC0+dLWuP+ifCqIm1Xz9+xCICKFD35MFJrfIzQ7xZ84P;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=jvasseur@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e1b0e72ff1bbd457ceef31828f216a86

Hi,

On Nov 30, 2006, at 4:23 PM, Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG  
> drafts:
>
> 1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and- 
> sc-reqs-04.txt
>
> 2. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls- 
> gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt
>

Yes

>
> 3. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter- 
> domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt
>

Yes (I'm a co-author).

Thanks.

JP.

> Please send yes or no for these IDs.
>
> Reasons and opinions are also welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Deborah and Adrian