RE: Polling for new WG IDs
"MEURIC Julien RD-CORE-LAN" <julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com> Fri, 08 December 2006 14:54 UTC
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gsh7Q-0005XC-9x for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:54:32 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gsh7O-00072C-VW for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:54:32 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1GsgsB-000KWt-Rq for ccamp-data@psg.com; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:38:47 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7
Received: from [195.101.245.15] (helo=p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com>) id 1Gsgs8-000KWR-13 for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:38:46 +0000
Received: from FTRDMEL2.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.193.117.153]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:38:38 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Polling for new WG IDs
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:38:35 +0100
Message-ID: <7DBAFEC6A76F3E42817DF1EBE64CB02604207A62@FTRDMEL2.rd.francetelecom.fr>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Polling for new WG IDs
Thread-Index: AccUxb62IK2YZ95YStGBKwhjGpYcPQDlDLKgAJ79bBA=
From: MEURIC Julien RD-CORE-LAN <julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com>
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Dec 2006 14:38:38.0021 (UTC) FILETIME=[8C299F50:01C71AD6]
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a2c12dacc0736f14d6b540e805505a86
Hi all. 1. I agree with Alessandro about draft-caviglia. 2. I'm still a bit confused with draft-kumaki positioning, so I'm not sure it's ready for WG document... 3. I support draft-takeda. Have a good week-end, Julien ________________________________ From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Capello Alessandro Yes to 1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt> I think this is an important issue for the evolution of transport networks. Regards, Alessandro ________________________________ From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS Hi, As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts: 1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt 2. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt 3. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt Please send yes or no for these IDs. Reasons and opinions are also welcome. Thanks, Deborah and Adrian -------------------------------------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by replying to webmaster@telecomitalia.it <mailto:webmaster@telecomitalia.it> . Thank you www.telecomitalia.it <http://www.telecomitalia.it> --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Polling for new WG IDs Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs JP Vasseur
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Pandian, Vijay
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Dean Cheng (dcheng)
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Richard Rabbat
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Ong, Lyndon
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Igor Bryskin
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Miya Kohno (mkohno)
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Peng He
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Dan Li
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Attila Takacs (IJ/ETH)
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs tom.petch
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs ken nagami
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Richard Rabbat
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Capello Alessandro
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs SHINDOME Kensuke
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Fabio Baroncelli
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Don Fedyk
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Wataru Imajuku
- Fw: Polling for new WG IDs Adrian Farrel
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Dimitri.Papadimitriou
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Yuji KAMITE
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs MEURIC Julien RD-CORE-LAN
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs raymond zhang
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Loa Andersson
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Diego Caviglia
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Loa Andersson
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Diego Caviglia
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS