RE: Polling for new WG IDs

"MEURIC Julien RD-CORE-LAN" <julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com> Fri, 08 December 2006 14:54 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gsh7Q-0005XC-9x for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:54:32 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gsh7O-00072C-VW for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:54:32 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1GsgsB-000KWt-Rq for ccamp-data@psg.com; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:38:47 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7
Received: from [195.101.245.15] (helo=p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com>) id 1Gsgs8-000KWR-13 for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:38:46 +0000
Received: from FTRDMEL2.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.193.117.153]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:38:38 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Polling for new WG IDs
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:38:35 +0100
Message-ID: <7DBAFEC6A76F3E42817DF1EBE64CB02604207A62@FTRDMEL2.rd.francetelecom.fr>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Polling for new WG IDs
Thread-Index: AccUxb62IK2YZ95YStGBKwhjGpYcPQDlDLKgAJ79bBA=
From: MEURIC Julien RD-CORE-LAN <julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com>
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Dec 2006 14:38:38.0021 (UTC) FILETIME=[8C299F50:01C71AD6]
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a2c12dacc0736f14d6b540e805505a86

Hi all.

1. I agree with Alessandro about draft-caviglia.

2. I'm still a bit confused with draft-kumaki positioning, so I'm not sure it's ready for WG document...

3. I support draft-takeda.


Have a good week-end,

Julien

________________________________

From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Capello Alessandro

Yes to 1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt> 

I think this is an important issue for the evolution of transport networks.

 

Regards,

Alessandro

 

________________________________

From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS

Hi,

 

As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:

 

1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt

 

2. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt

 

3. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt

 

Please send yes or no for these IDs.

 

Reasons and opinions are also welcome.

 

Thanks,

Deborah and Adrian

--------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons
above and may contain confidential information. If you have received
the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof
is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete
the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by
replying to webmaster@telecomitalia.it <mailto:webmaster@telecomitalia.it> .
        Thank you
                                        www.telecomitalia.it <http://www.telecomitalia.it> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------