IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Polling for new WG IDs

"Richard Rabbat" <rabbat@alum.mit.edu> Mon, 04 December 2006 18:23 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GrIT9-0003iU-Pf for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 13:23:11 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GrIT7-0004mH-A0 for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 13:23:11 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1GrIFK-000I5z-IV for ccamp-data@psg.com; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 18:08:54 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.1.7
Received: from [64.233.184.225] (helo=wr-out-0506.google.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <richard.rabbat@gmail.com>) id 1GrIEz-000I4u-Tj for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 18:08:48 +0000
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i31so833478wra for <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 10:08:32 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=dRon64r+wy116xgcxoEoFaRtvmn+M35WcLyTYjFX9U6k5FrKvte+9cKyUpkeRjkMatNwz5fOZ8s/BmLD/9PDn7K0BHXqaYc+1m6pg9Pz5lqlP9IkkHor0SlZToP/IiSp+0v9skD8i5h1pjTGQMbh+ajy62tGqZt4FO4dLwmApc0=
Received: by 10.90.83.14 with SMTP id g14mr8356351agb.1165255712248; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 10:08:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.90.115.17 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Dec 2006 10:08:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <cbe76faa0612041008i57b0cd86maeab8f8e20856605@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 10:08:31 -0800
From: Richard Rabbat <rabbat@alum.mit.edu>
To: "Attila Takacs (IJ/ETH)" <Attila.Takacs@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: Polling for new WG IDs
Cc: "Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <05F34B6959F19F43BBD78FFCD4C15D0501D4FAA4@esealmw116.eemea.ericsson.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_21232_32146176.1165255711994"
References: <449B2580D802A443A923DABF3EAB82AF0D36F9E9@OCCLUST04EVS1.ugd.att.com> <05F34B6959F19F43BBD78FFCD4C15D0501D4FAA4@esealmw116.eemea.ericsson.se>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 72357cc54e47dacc
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9a2be21919e71dc6faef12b370c4ecf5

I agree with you that the issue is very important. I can understand that
router vendors who don't use a management plane think it may be
over-engineering. we may also need to engage with TMF early on in the
process.
Richard.

On 12/4/06, Attila Takacs (IJ/ETH) <Attila.Takacs@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
>  Yes to: 1.
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt
> It is important to address this issue for management plane / control
> plane coexistence.
> Regards,
> Attila
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 30, 2006 10:23 PM
> *To:* ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> *Subject:* Polling for new WG IDs
>
>  Hi,
>
> As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:
>
> 1.
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt
>
> 2.
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt
>
> 3.
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt
>
> Please send yes or no for these IDs.
>
> Reasons and opinions are also welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Deborah and Adrian
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email