Re: Polling for new WG IDs
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se> Tue, 12 December 2006 10:56 UTC
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gu5Iv-0002FU-Ae for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:56:09 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gu5Iu-00014t-0L for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:56:09 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1Gu5CL-000JET-1K for ccamp-data@psg.com; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:49:21 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7
Received: from [80.86.78.228] (helo=smtp.testbed.se) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <loa@pi.se>) id 1Gu5C7-000JDb-Bw for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:49:12 +0000
Received: from gw.imc.kth.se ([193.10.152.67] helo=[172.16.2.49]) by fw.testbed.se with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1Gu5C3-0003BJ-Op; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:49:05 +0100
Message-ID: <457E891E.4010108@pi.se>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:49:02 +0100
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>
Organization: Acreo AB
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Diego Caviglia <Diego.Caviglia@marconi.com>
CC: ccamp <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Polling for new WG IDs
References: <OFA8FF2E54.DA392D68-ONC1257242.00392F6C-C1257242.00395F79@uk.marconicomms.com>
In-Reply-To: <OFA8FF2E54.DA392D68-ONC1257242.00392F6C-C1257242.00395F79@uk.marconicomms.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 6d95a152022472c7d6cdf886a0424dc6
Diego, will you be at all able to decide whether another AS uses the cp or mp to setup the connection? Wouldn't it be better to leave the inter-domain aspects explicitly for further study. /Loa Diego Caviglia wrote: > Hi Loa, > the ID is generic enough to be applied to intra and inter > domian, of course in case you have inter domain with different NMS you need > coordination among the different NMS. > > Regards > > Diego > > > > Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>@ops.ietf.org on 12/12/2006 11.19.48 > > Sent by: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org > > > To: raymond zhang <zhangr@sa.infonet.com> > cc: "Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org > > Subject: Re: Polling for new WG IDs > > All, > > I support making 2 and 3 wg docs, and have a question on > the first. > > Is draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt intended for > intra-domain only? > > /Loa > > raymond zhang wrote: >> Hi, >> >> At 01:23 PM 11/30/2006, Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG > drafts: >>> 1. >>> < > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt > >>> >>> 2. >>> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt > >> Yes... >> >>> 3. >>> < > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt > >> >> Yes... >> >> Regards, >> Raymond >> >>> Please send yes or no for these IDs. >>> >>> Reasons and opinions are also welcome. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Deborah and Adrian >> >> >> > > > -- > Loa Andersson > > Principal Networking Architect > Acreo AB phone: +46 8 632 77 14 > Isafjordsgatan 22 mobile: +46 739 81 21 64 > Kista, Sweden email: loa.andersson@acreo.se > loa@pi.se > > > > > > > > -- Loa Andersson Principal Networking Architect Acreo AB phone: +46 8 632 77 14 Isafjordsgatan 22 mobile: +46 739 81 21 64 Kista, Sweden email: loa.andersson@acreo.se loa@pi.se
- Polling for new WG IDs Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs JP Vasseur
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Pandian, Vijay
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Dean Cheng (dcheng)
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Richard Rabbat
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Ong, Lyndon
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Igor Bryskin
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Miya Kohno (mkohno)
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Peng He
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Dan Li
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Attila Takacs (IJ/ETH)
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs tom.petch
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs ken nagami
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Richard Rabbat
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Capello Alessandro
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs SHINDOME Kensuke
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Fabio Baroncelli
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Don Fedyk
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Wataru Imajuku
- Fw: Polling for new WG IDs Adrian Farrel
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Dimitri.Papadimitriou
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Yuji KAMITE
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs MEURIC Julien RD-CORE-LAN
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs raymond zhang
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Loa Andersson
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Diego Caviglia
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Loa Andersson
- Re: Polling for new WG IDs Diego Caviglia
- RE: Polling for new WG IDs Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS