IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Polling for new WG IDs

"Richard Rabbat" <rabbat@alum.mit.edu> Fri, 01 December 2006 17:56 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqCcx-0002Yx-04 for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:56:47 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqCcv-0007A4-I3 for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:56:46 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1GqCVO-0002YA-TT for ccamp-data@psg.com; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:48:58 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.1.7
Received: from [64.233.184.231] (helo=wr-out-0506.google.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <richard.rabbat@gmail.com>) id 1GqCUw-0002Tk-8t for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:48:50 +0000
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i31so555695wra for <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:48:29 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=WUAdhAqm/F6BnNOymSu6sX2BV4eAZ9ovWcsqR1EFAJCc9+quWtzzjA5iP1Ge8LiTz3IK6FmSeNkNQPboR5BsZDStJbVnhopCIdWZkbynvrkMoGeaJTEQ+DaD6ZVkQ46H7zjUsEuTaWgoqkhMe5Upj1DDfC8KgkkuQiEUKyRIJy0=
Received: by 10.90.78.9 with SMTP id a9mr5495792agb.1164995309408; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:48:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.90.115.17 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:48:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <cbe76faa0612010948j2764c7e2t35063031fd416e5f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:48:29 -0800
From: Richard Rabbat <rabbat@alum.mit.edu>
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Polling for new WG IDs
Cc: "Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <70BC84B185C3EE448EDB7AB8956D3B0E02AF332C@xmb-sjc-234.amer.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1566_27287056.1164995309316"
References: <70BC84B185C3EE448EDB7AB8956D3B0E02AF332C@xmb-sjc-234.amer.cisco.com>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 52e2002d35bb89a5
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a2c12dacc0736f14d6b540e805505a86

yes to all
richard

On 12/1/06, Dean Cheng (dcheng) <dcheng@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>  Yes to all.
>
> Dean
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 30, 2006 1:23 PM
> *To:* ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> *Subject:* Polling for new WG IDs
>
>  Hi,
>
> As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:
>
> 1.
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt
>
> 2.
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt
>
> 3.
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt
>
> Please send yes or no for these IDs.
>
> Reasons and opinions are also welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Deborah and Adrian
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email