IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Polling for new WG IDs

"Pandian, Vijay" <Vijay.Pandian@sycamorenet.com> Fri, 01 December 2006 15:27 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqAIb-0002Nz-CO for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 10:27:37 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqAIZ-00042D-Sy for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 10:27:37 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1GqAAP-000AlG-KN for ccamp-data@psg.com; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:19:09 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=3.1.7
Received: from [12.146.0.143] (helo=falcon.sycamorenet.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <Vijay.Pandian@sycamorenet.com>) id 1GqA9j-000Aej-EY for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:18:58 +0000
Received: from viper.sycamorenet.com ([10.5.1.105]) by falcon.sycamorenet.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 10:19:08 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7155C.12287EC0"
Subject: RE: Polling for new WG IDs
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 10:19:18 -0500
Message-ID: <0679BA70A2F59E49B186858B47F4595C01007D49@viper.sycamorenet.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Polling for new WG IDs
Thread-Index: AccUxb62IK2YZ95YStGBKwhjGpYcPQAlbDVw
From: "Pandian, Vijay" <Vijay.Pandian@sycamorenet.com>
To: "Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Dec 2006 15:19:08.0484 (UTC) FILETIME=[0BF09840:01C7155C]
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0ff9c467ad7f19c2a6d058acd7faaec8

1.  <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt
 
Yes. In my opinion, if we believe in the usefulness of the Control Plane in a transport network, this draft addresses a very important problem that helps migration of legacy networks.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 4:23 PM
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Polling for new WG IDs


Hi,
 
As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:
 
1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt
 
2. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt
 
3. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt
 
Please send yes or no for these IDs.
 
Reasons and opinions are also welcome.
 
Thanks,
Deborah and Adrian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email