IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Polling for new WG IDs

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se> Tue, 12 December 2006 10:31 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gu4v1-0007Yp-A6 for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:31:27 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gu4uz-0004Uw-VW for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:31:27 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1Gu4k3-000GGa-VQ for ccamp-data@psg.com; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:20:07 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7
Received: from [80.86.78.228] (helo=smtp.testbed.se) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <loa@pi.se>) id 1Gu4jx-000GDs-1M for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:20:06 +0000
Received: from gw.imc.kth.se ([193.10.152.67] helo=[172.16.2.49]) by fw.testbed.se with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1Gu4jm-00031s-3Y; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:19:55 +0100
Message-ID: <457E8244.7090009@pi.se>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:19:48 +0100
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>
Organization: Acreo AB
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: raymond zhang <zhangr@sa.infonet.com>
CC: "Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Polling for new WG IDs
References: <449B2580D802A443A923DABF3EAB82AF0D36F9E9@OCCLUST04EVS1.ugd.att.com> <6.2.1.2.2.20061211203429.044a9168@sa.infonet.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.2.20061211203429.044a9168@sa.infonet.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 02ec665d00de228c50c93ed6b5e4fc1a

All,

I support making 2 and 3 wg docs, and have a question on
the first.

Is draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt intended for
intra-domain only?

/Loa

raymond zhang wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> At 01:23 PM 11/30/2006, Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:
>>
>> 1.
>> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt
>>
>>
>> 2.
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt
>>
> 
> Yes...
> 
>>
>> 3.
>> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt
>>
> 
> 
> Yes...
> 
> Regards,
> Raymond
> 
>>
>> Please send yes or no for these IDs.
>>
>> Reasons and opinions are also welcome.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Deborah and Adrian
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Loa Andersson

Principal Networking Architect
Acreo AB                           phone:  +46 8 632 77 14
Isafjordsgatan 22                  mobile: +46 739 81 21 64
Kista, Sweden                      email:  loa.andersson@acreo.se
                                           loa@pi.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email