IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Polling for new WG IDs

Igor Bryskin <i_bryskin@yahoo.com> Sat, 02 December 2006 13:52 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqVIC-0002cc-BV for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 08:52:36 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqVI8-0007Wb-PP for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 08:52:36 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1GqV2N-000E2u-GF for ccamp-data@psg.com; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 13:36:15 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=3.1.7
Received: from [209.191.85.62] (helo=web36811.mail.mud.yahoo.com) by psg.com with smtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <i_bryskin@yahoo.com>) id 1GqV23-000E0y-AR for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 13:36:09 +0000
Received: (qmail 66405 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Dec 2006 13:35:53 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=fg+8irb01WUB8oFIg4B+e/AQ3WDhTk7lpKtWVGGiQdZ8cDePtmohyPxjWCqKymnyXNhf6HacQrWDfQFsLKecKMpk0dhKjULVpz9DpXYtLJq0Qfc4YGZOPRDgx6wMyzYwlGgcH3rUbaDWvLj9zn3yIGZEdUE/ijzyWqT5q06wdEY=;
X-YMail-OSG: 03O9PSAVM1nAnXLIMlVJrFQT.HfqCAmtVgXYLuAuEu93MWtD.USd8FbQhcGQfWy65FubHax1DPbuwfnaNEBmXNxLA4avqSP8qJqnDo3l3YktCrwBWqiO5unUoPW7TKrdN9Yk_eMM.Dg-
Received: from [70.177.176.223] by web36811.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 05:35:53 PST
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 05:35:53 -0800
From: Igor Bryskin <i_bryskin@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Polling for new WG IDs
To: "Ong, Lyndon" <Lyong@Ciena.com>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>, "Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <0901D1988E815341A0103206A834DA07012056D6@mdmxm02.ciena.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-950315085-1165066553=:65825"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <304173.65825.qm@web36811.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 00e94c813bef7832af255170dca19e36

Yes to all three.

Igor

"Ong, Lyndon" <Lyong@Ciena.com> wrote:     Hi Folks,
  
 I agree with Zafar on this.  No, Yes and  Yes.
  
 Cheers,
  
 Lyndon

  
---------------------------------
 From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org  [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Zafar Ali  (zali)
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 8:23 PM
To:  Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS; ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Polling  for new WG IDs


 
  
---------------------------------
 From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org  [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brungard, Deborah A,  ALABS
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 4:23 PM
To:  ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Polling for new WG  IDs


    
   Hi,
    
   As discussed in    San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:
    
   1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt 
    
 No, IMO transferring the ownership  and control of an existing and in-use Data Plane connection between the  Management Plane and the Control Plane is over-engineering.  
     
   2. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt 
    
 Yes,  
     
   3. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt 
    
 Yes,  
     
   Please send yes or    no for these IDs.
    
   Reasons and    opinions are also welcome.
    
   Thanks,
   Deborah and    Adrian


 
---------------------------------
Check out the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email