IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Polling for new WG IDs

Dan Li <danli@huawei.com> Mon, 04 December 2006 02:07 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gr3EV-0004br-Kn for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 21:07:03 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gr3EU-000837-76 for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 21:07:03 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1Gr30j-0000j4-LR for ccamp-data@psg.com; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 01:52:49 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=3.1.7
Received: from [61.144.161.55] (helo=szxga03-in.huawei.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <danli@huawei.com>) id 1Gr307-0000dM-S2 for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 01:52:31 +0000
Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J9Q00JQ47TVBM@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 09:51:31 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.18]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J9Q00JXH7TUJY@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 09:51:31 +0800 (CST)
Received: from l37133 ([10.70.76.208]) by szxml03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0J9Q00M3B7TT6P@szxml03-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 09:51:30 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 09:51:32 +0800
From: Dan Li <danli@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: Polling for new WG IDs
To: "Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Message-id: <008c01c71746$b9587480$d04c460a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_I+Z6R9HXmg0/EoM3w7Mbrw)"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <449B2580D802A443A923DABF3EAB82AF0D36F9E9@OCCLUST04EVS1.ugd.att.com>
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 67c1ea29f88502ef6a32ccec927970f0

Hi,

1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt

Yes. I believe all the comments which also have been summarized in Adrian's email (on Sept. 15th) have been addressed in the revised draft.

Thanks,

Dan

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS 
  To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org 
  Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 5:23 AM
  Subject: Polling for new WG IDs


  Hi,

  As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:

  1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt

  2. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt

  3. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt

  Please send yes or no for these IDs.

  Reasons and opinions are also welcome.

  Thanks,
  Deborah and Adrian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email