IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Polling for new WG IDs

"Yuji KAMITE" <y.kamite@ntt.com> Fri, 08 December 2006 02:56 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GsVuv-0001N9-Sd for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 21:56:53 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GsVuq-00079m-JT for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 21:56:53 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1GsVmk-000IN8-BO for ccamp-data@psg.com; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 02:48:26 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.1.7
Received: from [210.160.15.5] (helo=mgw1.noc.ntt.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <y.kamite@ntt.com>) id 1GsVmh-000IMq-Mc for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 02:48:25 +0000
Received: from mop2.noc.ntt.com by mgw1.noc.ntt.com (NTT-Com MailSV) with ESMTP id kB82a2Ib022123 for <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:48:21 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mip2.noc.ntt.com (mvi2.noc.ntt.com) by mop2.noc.ntt.com (NTT-Com MailSV) with ESMTP id <0J9X0057BP1T81@ntt.com> for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 11:46:41 +0900 (JST)
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 11:46:40 +0900
From: Yuji KAMITE <y.kamite@ntt.com>
Subject: RE: Polling for new WG IDs
In-reply-to: <449B2580D802A443A923DABF3EAB82AF0D36F9E9@OCCLUST04EVS1.ugd.att.com>
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Message-id: <0J9X007G5P1S6E@ntt.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Thread-index: AccUxb62IK2YZ95YStGBKwhjGpYcPQFolcpg
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352

 
 > 1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt
	
Yes.

> 2. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt
	 
Yes.

> 3. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt
	 
Yes.

Thanks.

-Yuji

________________________________

	From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS
	Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 6:23 AM
	To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
	Subject: Polling for new WG IDs
	
	
	Hi,
	 
	As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:
	 
	1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt
	 
	2. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt
	 
	3. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt
	 
	Please send yes or no for these IDs.
	 
	Reasons and opinions are also welcome.
	 
	Thanks,
	Deborah and Adrian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email