Re: [CCAMP] Generalized Labels for the Flexi-Grid in LSC Label Switching Routers

[Huub van Helvoort <[e-mail]>]

Hola Ramon,

G.694.1 does not define a maximum value for "m".

However G.697 gives in Appendix V.1: Wavelength ID.
"m" = 9 bits (m is encoded as a 9-bit unsigned integer).

Regards, Huub.


 >> I am happy if we don't need to do so. But is this not better than
>> defining/ extending a new label format when ITU-T changes the data plane?
>
> Dear all,
>
> I may be missing something (apologies in advance if it is the case) and
> since I don't have them here right now, for the sake of this discussion,
> maybe could anyone point to the relevant part of the document(s) e.g.
> G.694.1 / G.872 etc. where it is said that the value of m is bound to 256?
> We are aware of the concept of frequency slot, nominal central
> frequencies (n, and their values) and the concept of frequency slot
> width, but I cannot recall now such a bound.
>
> Thanks
> R.
>


-- 
*****************************************************************
               请记住，你是独一无二的，就像其他每一个人一样