IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] Generalized Labels for the Flexi-Grid in LSC Label Switching Routers

"Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" <ggalimbe@cisco.com> Mon, 03 February 2014 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ggalimbe@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF021A0129 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 06:48:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MANGLED_FORM=2.3, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tqwbgIqzFIfl for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 06:48:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A911A0127 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 06:48:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2562; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1391438904; x=1392648504; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=HMJBF401ov3YsLJ3hjuOQDalBiAANfGHGUezby4DPcQ=; b=mOuhto/9kRLqAoO975vR12E7e91Cm+b6s/fpYrrPXx8rYX9Vy9ciVqXu kZViyNr08pu0SOYQu8zKN7VT/GsrA4rlpcjAJJdYjgU+PlvqcGcN7EVYx AzDi2TC4k6z60qKLgvB4GHXBBhwlshCDiCHet/RRivIRpcVlqFpZJgJxY U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlIFAB+r71KtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABZgw44VYMDug4YchYBdIN/AQQBAQExFSULDgQBBgIcKAQZBgYLJQIEAQ0Fh3ADEQ2PO5tjCJEqDYkyFwSBIYtagXgbB4JqgUwBA5YrgWuMWoU6gW2BPoIq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,772,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="298469821"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2014 14:48:23 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s13EmMkH023975 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 3 Feb 2014 14:48:22 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.71]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 08:48:22 -0600
From: "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" <ggalimbe@cisco.com>
To: "huubatwork@gmail.com" <huubatwork@gmail.com>, Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>, Oscar González de Dios <ogondio@tid.es>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Generalized Labels for the Flexi-Grid in LSC Label Switching Routers
Thread-Index: AQHPIO77UqnGK5MZTkidP1a0HuaLvA==
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 14:48:21 +0000
Message-ID: <CF156999.5723C%ggalimbe@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <52EFA6EA.1060903@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.7.130812
x-originating-ip: [144.254.172.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-ID: <D1C62837E2A60447BF5418B87EDF8BAC@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Generalized Labels for the Flexi-Grid in LSC Label Switching Routers
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 14:48:24 -0000

Thanks Huub,

At this point we have to options:

1) update the IETF draft to m = 9 bits  (note this m value range covers
the whole spectrum if the granularity is 12.5GHz.)
2) propose to ITU-T Q6 to amend the G.697 (m from 9 to 16 bits) and modify
the IETF draft to m = 16 bits.

Regards, 

Gabriele




Gabriele Galimberti
Technical Leader
Cisco Photonics Srl


Via Philips, 12
20900 - Monza (MI)
Italy
www.cisco.com/global/IT/ <http://www.cisco.com/global/IT/>

ggalimbe@cisco.com
Phone :+39 039 2091462
Mobile :+39 335 7481947
Fax :+39 039 2092049
















On 2/3/14 3:25 PM, "Huub van Helvoort" <huubatwork@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hola Ramon,
>
>G.694.1 does not define a maximum value for "m".
>
>However G.697 gives in Appendix V.1: Wavelength ID.
>"m" = 9 bits (m is encoded as a 9-bit unsigned integer).
>
>Regards, Huub.
>
>
> >> I am happy if we don't need to do so. But is this not better than
>>> defining/ extending a new label format when ITU-T changes the data
>>>plane?
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I may be missing something (apologies in advance if it is the case) and
>> since I don't have them here right now, for the sake of this discussion,
>> maybe could anyone point to the relevant part of the document(s) e.g.
>> G.694.1 / G.872 etc. where it is said that the value of m is bound to
>>256?
>> We are aware of the concept of frequency slot, nominal central
>> frequencies (n, and their values) and the concept of frequency slot
>> width, but I cannot recall now such a bound.
>>
>> Thanks
>> R.
>>
>
>
>-- 
>*****************************************************************
>               请记住，你是独一无二的，就像其他每一个人一样
>_______________________________________________
>CCAMP mailing list
>CCAMP@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email