[clouds] 答复: Re: Use cases

I do agree the point is to find the suitable part for IETF without 
overlaps with others.

For me, the interoperability between cloud entities or between different 
clouds could be the candidates.

Meng Yu

Mark Webb <mwebb@cisco.com> 
发件人:  clouds-bounces@ietf.org
2010-04-07 23:09

收件人
clouds@ietf.org
抄送

主题
Re: [clouds] Use cases

I was not there at the BoF, but did get reports from a couple of people in 
attendance.

An important perspective is to ensure IETF does NOT start a new effort 
that overlaps with other SDO and Forum already underway.  The industry 
does not need more SDO declaring they are relevant to cloud computing IMO. 

Seeking contributions on relevant & IETF appropriate gap analysis is the 
_most_ that should be pursued at this point in time.

Mark Webb

On Apr 7, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Gene Golovinsky wrote:

Well, I think this is a topic worthy of IETF time and attention.
How can I help to move the discussion forward?

Was there any specific area out of the white paper discussed?
I think Cloud interoperability and security are topics were IETF is 
traditionally focusing its efforts.

--Gene

-----Original Message-----
From: clouds-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:clouds-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf 
Of Peter Saint-Andre
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 9:48 AM
To: clouds@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [clouds] Use cases

On 4/7/10 8:40 AM, Gene Golovinsky wrote:

>    2. I saw references to bar BoF at last IETF meeting, but could not
>       really figure out if the WG was chartered.

It was a bar BoF, not a real BoF. And IMHO the discussion was so nebulous 
that folks are a long way from forming a WG.

Peter

--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

_______________________________________________
clouds mailing list
clouds@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds
_______________________________________________
clouds mailing list
clouds@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds