Re: [clouds] Use cases

Gene Golovinsky <gene@alertlogic.com> Wed, 07 April 2010 14:58 UTC

From: Gene Golovinsky <gene@alertlogic.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, "clouds@ietf.org" <clouds@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:57:48 -0500
Thread-Topic: [clouds] Use cases
Thread-Index: AcrWYVhrMWEHxracSgqQI49KTUY9RQAAOgow
Message-ID: <C6A1D07CACFDBD4D9422C7D7ED288D41041896119B@34093-MBX-C01.mex07a.mlsrvr.com>
References: <C6A1D07CACFDBD4D9422C7D7ED288D41041896117A@34093-MBX-C01.mex07a.mlsrvr.com> <4BBC9B0C.5050207@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4BBC9B0C.5050207@stpeter.im>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [clouds] Use cases
Precedence: list

Well, I think this is a topic worthy of IETF time and attention.
How can I help to move the discussion forward?

Was there any specific area out of the white paper discussed? 
I think Cloud interoperability and security are topics were IETF is traditionally focusing its efforts.

--Gene

-----Original Message-----
From: clouds-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:clouds-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter Saint-Andre
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 9:48 AM
To: clouds@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [clouds] Use cases

On 4/7/10 8:40 AM, Gene Golovinsky wrote:

>    2. I saw references to bar BoF at last IETF meeting, but could not
>       really figure out if the WG was chartered. 

It was a bar BoF, not a real BoF. And IMHO the discussion was so nebulous that folks are a long way from forming a WG.

Peter

--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

[clouds] Use cases Gene Golovinsky
Re: [clouds] Use cases Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [clouds] Use cases Gene Golovinsky
Re: [clouds] Use cases Mark Webb
Re: [clouds] Use cases Gene Golovinsky
[clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Linda Dunbar
Re: [clouds] Use cases Mark Webb
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Carl Williams
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Linda Dunbar
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Melinda Shore
[clouds] 答复: Re: Use cases meng.yu
Re: [clouds] Use cases Bhumip Khasnabish
Re: [clouds] Use cases Masum Hasan (masum)
Re: [clouds] Use cases Bhumip Khasnabish
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Gene Golovinsky
Re: [clouds] Use cases Gene Golovinsky
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Mark Webb
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Gene Golovinsky
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Sam Johnston
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Sam Johnston
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Linda Dunbar
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Bhumip Khasnabish
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big So, Ning
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Linda Dunbar
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Masum Hasan (masum)
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Masum Hasan (masum)
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Mark Carlson
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Melinda Shore
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Mark Carlson
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Gene Golovinsky
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Mark Webb
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Stephen Fleece
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Linda Dunbar
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Sam Johnston
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Mark Carlson
[clouds] (no subject) zhangyunfei
[clouds] (no subject) zhangyunfei
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Monique Morrow (mmorrow)
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Ning Zong
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Sun Shaoling
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Bhumip Khasnabish
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Bhumip Khasnabish
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Bhumip Khasnabish
Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Romascanu, Dan (Dan)