Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?

Pat Thaler <pat.thaler@broadcom.com> Wed, 14 September 2016 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <pat.thaler@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4671E12BA4B for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GoMpe6r0B04p for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x229.google.com (mail-yw0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A7BA12BB62 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x229.google.com with SMTP id u82so22872645ywc.2 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QtxSAX1MrKlTf2UrOBLNdQoUQIay19bgJlkueABExzo=; b=FW0SLdO6jMYqZMmyVS2Aht16/LLLY0Zij6WGx6PNf46DOGWoPhv9tU7d4nxBydKFR3 g/wZyDIXsV1ZExcZz8Tlr6Hmb407CA5OkIeSIbxYCJ0FSn5Fm1ifL+RjYBtEojX27xsT HZne+JyAfIi72zrsDFXF2cdbUs3gRhZFLJQfM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QtxSAX1MrKlTf2UrOBLNdQoUQIay19bgJlkueABExzo=; b=feNvwW5cQ6vcFBNaDAXSoH3czSeNIBENtuKpgwpPLbqEdVh+4ZHnhP19pYwzSyU3JF +vMjASljQZKlTtMEwgXHjvla4pC7BHlEoSxhKw4/IaB3de2h9ygNm1NNOcKGBkJNjbMS izHYECpcf3fUdWz08XbarwpobBRPFywz6slxhTRcoMJpykZUp5y+S5nmk+KjBGAbM/4l 58LC4xYzOYHX/qB3VyWZlY2W39hldC6m/JistB7Gm9gJkAOlirox/Y2vBbo27qj3fcmq eeEEBpo4wFbMSRgwYz/LGF7T4NI2NJSPRg3tsBobiNYfEB6KZamnbn/tR+WguHyGF314 lsdQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNPo70QLtiOpiq+Pivm5FYalxw/FVnhBa4d4HiAFIHRIDA/U5k3kXSal2G2tVf8S42y89FIl9yfjPlOK7Ck
X-Received: by 10.129.109.66 with SMTP id i63mr3311903ywc.171.1473865485158; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.5.36 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9d1296dc430f4e2f8d2e1ebfbcf3f3d3@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <CAJt_5EiCuq2uv5R96uhSMrXdDJTvq52iS0cz-uZ=mizFv+ad+w@mail.gmail.com> <2b68a777-c951-ee05-7d0f-8ade257d9972@labn.net> <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C85DD807F7@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com> <2fdead88-1ccc-54d5-4158-60f8bfa7650f@labn.net> <CA+GutmVFcik0sK=1ipx0f9LDR3K+oQR3-CxWE+NLSHYQ-L0=6g@mail.gmail.com> <c1086ba6-0c3a-9c96-06fd-e4701d6bf54e@labn.net> <CAJt_5Ej+QV6kogL9KwTtH7ONcgO2y-oSMEKMkRph=vvUHpQn7Q@mail.gmail.com> <9d1296dc430f4e2f8d2e1ebfbcf3f3d3@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
From: Pat Thaler <pat.thaler@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:04:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJt_5EjuuVJmZ=F1TGp5OkNFy9baxDA37bJ_QOjg98wFLFhj6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114db3c2b1da90053c790ced"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/0Sy1N9O1kC-3GUkwUZCTLD0VK3Q>
Cc: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>, "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:37:22 -0000

Thank you for the confirmation, Pascal.

Regards,
Pat

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:

> The Cisco IPR no longer applies, Pat;
>
>
>
> I took action with our lawyers to get the post removed and associated with
> the new separate draft:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-bier-
> replication-elimination-00.txt
>
>
>
> IPR vs. informational is a difficult match, apparently.
>
>
>
> Take care,
>
>
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* detnet [mailto:detnet-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Pat Thaler
> *Sent:* mercredi 14 septembre 2016 16:11
> *To:* Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
> *Cc:* Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>; detnet@ietf.org;
> BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A <db3546@att.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?
>
>
>
> There was a question from S.V.R Anand - it isn't clear to me whether that
> would create a change in the draft.
>
> There were commentsalong with a support from Oliver Marce.
>
> Both those emails were August 22.
>
>
>
> Also, this from Loa Anderson:
>
> While I support adopting he draft that will result from removing the
> BIER-TE discussion my reading of this thread is that the RAND IPR
> disclosure that Adrian pointed out is still in effect. Since we all
> seem to be very careful (and rightly so) around IPR discussions, my
> take is that we not have consensus to adopt the document with the
> IPR disclosure still in effect.
>
>
>
> My understanding of the LOA was that it was submitted due to the BIER-TE
> content. It would be good if Pascal would clarify that it no longer applies.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Pat
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:40 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
>
> Thanks Jouni -- Are there any other issues raised during the adoption
> poll that have not yet been addressed?
>
> Lou
>
>
> On 9/14/2016 7:15 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > I just submitted dp-alt-04 with BIER-TE carved out. I also implemented
> > grammar-only corrections proposed by Ethan.
> >
> > - Jouni
> >
>
>
>