Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 02 September 2016 18:19 UTC
Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006ED12D145 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k30_7DM-NBQa for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.33.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CD9ED12B04A for <detnet@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 1359 invoked by uid 0); 2 Sep 2016 18:19:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw2) (10.0.90.83) by gproxy8.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 2 Sep 2016 18:19:35 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw2 with id eiKW1t00w2SSUrH01iKZl2; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 12:19:34 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=SIHRCofH c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=GW1xBdLrtEIA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=Q-fNiiVtAAAA:8 a=xXOlbtKQKZZWVN_o0KUA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=eHoMGkbREtcA:10 a=g5nYF-nEmWsA:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22 a=Fp8MccfUoT0GBdDC_Lng:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject; bh=+JSopnUtEwQ2OjO5417Y0A7xNytHagghpbmkJsVXwhE=; b=VhIb151nO7RL346uJCHoBnhiGU GbBJTiVHSuZZifSaCau9a2SLJQKSlsWMfM8q0ztGBabBfRIZNQtWAAYOVNPbv2nL7/VDDTq7vAnk4 pGlZUSy2GjmdC7xvqWLZ6FAwB;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:45355 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1bft3s-0000id-Ae; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 12:19:32 -0600
To: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>, Pat Thaler <pat.thaler@broadcom.com>, "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>
References: <CAJt_5EiCuq2uv5R96uhSMrXdDJTvq52iS0cz-uZ=mizFv+ad+w@mail.gmail.com> <2b68a777-c951-ee05-7d0f-8ade257d9972@labn.net> <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C85DD807F7@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <2fdead88-1ccc-54d5-4158-60f8bfa7650f@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 14:19:29 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C85DD807F7@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-Source-IP: 69.89.31.113
X-Exim-ID: 1bft3s-0000id-Ae
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: box313.bluehost.com ([127.0.0.1]) [69.89.31.113]:45355
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 0
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/rZ6ZybN7sna8vz2rNmUNUECwtuE>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 18:19:43 -0000
Deborah, message received. All, It looks like we'll need a new rev from the DT before publishing the WG version. (Following option c in my message identified below [1].) Lou On 9/2/2016 2:08 PM, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A wrote: > Hi, > > I was on vacation and still catching up on email - a couple of items from the charter: > > - BIER-TE is out-of-scope per the charter for detnet, so it should not be included even in a working group document. > - this document is not listed on your milestones, we need to keep focus on completing the chartered deliverables. > > Thanks - good weekends! > Deborah > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: detnet [mailto:detnet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger >> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 7:48 AM >> To: Pat Thaler <pat.thaler@broadcom.com>; detnet@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03? >> >> Sorry about being a day late on this. >> >> For the record, I want to restate my view from [1] that this document is >> not the right place for *any* mechanism definition -- and that the >> BIER-TE definitions should be removed prior to the document being >> published as an RFC. >> >> Lou >> >> [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/detnet/current/msg00693.html >> >> On 8/19/2016 2:53 PM, Pat Thaler wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> This is start of a two-week poll on making >>> draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03 a working group document. Please >>> send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not >>> support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the >>> document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd >>> like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. >>> >>> The poll ends April 1, 2016 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Pat Thaler >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> detnet mailing list >>> detnet@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet >> >> _______________________________________________ >> detnet mailing list >> detnet@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Dan Romascanu
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Balázs Varga A
- [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03? Pat Thaler
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Norman Finn (nfinn)
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Prof. Diego Dujovne
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… zhayiyong
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… S.V.R.Anand
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Olivier Marce
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Pat Thaler
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Pat Thaler
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Zhuangyan (Yan)
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Subir Das
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Alon Regev
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… nfinn
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Patrick Wetterwald (pwetterw)
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Kieran Tyrrell
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Grossman, Ethan A.
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Lou Berger
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… János Farkas
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Lou Berger
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Pat Thaler
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Pat Thaler
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Lou Berger
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Pat Thaler
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Pat Thaler
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Pat Thaler
- Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-0… Jouni Korhonen