IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Wed, 14 September 2016 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F3312B916 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.028
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.028 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gYnfy3KysVmc for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFF1A12B9E0 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13116; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1473864774; x=1475074374; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=HrEy+sCZuzLgaapDXihPA7UjAbouVpSHGz2v+5E6OUE=; b=Lclwt1ITobY2hDxY78xgqnHSP/AJozbLSk4iYUq1Eo9crdfswgruYn4H +hvxx+Ku2AcFNLHYwYCv/SkhSX6buWSmYUDEsiY8TNFm+mZVLu/heyXAX JBy3MyfRwt8s/Vq2uNGmSfaFDwBKIuZFOKuAEOblmsCM8P7Ptz8D56wS+ o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ClAQDoY9lX/5JdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgwczAQEBAQEeV3wHjSymFYUQggMmhXgCHIExOBQBAgEBAQEBAQFeJ4RhAQEBBCMKTBACAQgRBAEBAScDAgICMBQJCAIEAQ0FCIhCDq9ljD4BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBYYxhE+EVx+CTIJaBZloAYYkiSiPaYxbg3oBHjaEaXABhiF/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,334,1470700800"; d="scan'208,217";a="322020581"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2016 14:52:53 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (xch-rcd-004.cisco.com [173.37.102.14]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u8EEqrua010540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:52:53 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:52:52 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:52:52 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Pat Thaler <pat.thaler@broadcom.com>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Thread-Topic: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?
Thread-Index: AQHSDpboY2zHLEZr0E67viQlHGrTQKB5EOag
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:52:46 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:52:04 +0000
Message-ID: <9d1296dc430f4e2f8d2e1ebfbcf3f3d3@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <CAJt_5EiCuq2uv5R96uhSMrXdDJTvq52iS0cz-uZ=mizFv+ad+w@mail.gmail.com> <2b68a777-c951-ee05-7d0f-8ade257d9972@labn.net> <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C85DD807F7@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com> <2fdead88-1ccc-54d5-4158-60f8bfa7650f@labn.net> <CA+GutmVFcik0sK=1ipx0f9LDR3K+oQR3-CxWE+NLSHYQ-L0=6g@mail.gmail.com> <c1086ba6-0c3a-9c96-06fd-e4701d6bf54e@labn.net> <CAJt_5Ej+QV6kogL9KwTtH7ONcgO2y-oSMEKMkRph=vvUHpQn7Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJt_5Ej+QV6kogL9KwTtH7ONcgO2y-oSMEKMkRph=vvUHpQn7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.228.216.12]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9d1296dc430f4e2f8d2e1ebfbcf3f3d3XCHRCD001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/ZMCrAgs29ihE4EalVZ6EQdOH2VE>
Cc: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>, "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:27:32 -0000

The Cisco IPR no longer applies, Pat;

I took action with our lawyers to get the post removed and associated with the new separate draft:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-bier-replication-elimination-00.txt

IPR vs. informational is a difficult match, apparently.

Take care,

Pascal



From: detnet [mailto:detnet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pat Thaler
Sent: mercredi 14 septembre 2016 16:11
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Cc: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>; detnet@ietf.org; BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A <db3546@att.com>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?

There was a question from S.V.R Anand - it isn't clear to me whether that would create a change in the draft.
There were commentsalong with a support from Oliver Marce.
Both those emails were August 22.

Also, this from Loa Anderson:
While I support adopting he draft that will result from removing the
BIER-TE discussion my reading of this thread is that the RAND IPR
disclosure that Adrian pointed out is still in effect. Since we all
seem to be very careful (and rightly so) around IPR discussions, my
take is that we not have consensus to adopt the document with the
IPR disclosure still in effect.

My understanding of the LOA was that it was submitted due to the BIER-TE content. It would be good if Pascal would clarify that it no longer applies.

Regards,
Pat

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:40 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote:
Thanks Jouni -- Are there any other issues raised during the adoption
poll that have not yet been addressed?

Lou

On 9/14/2016 7:15 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I just submitted dp-alt-04 with BIER-TE carved out. I also implemented
> grammar-only corrections proposed by Ethan.
>
> - Jouni
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email