IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?

Pat Thaler <pat.thaler@broadcom.com> Fri, 02 September 2016 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <pat.thaler@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578FC12B006 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NZTmlzxt-fVM for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x229.google.com (mail-it0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4783E1288B8 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x229.google.com with SMTP id i184so54453598itf.1 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 12:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AZ9ouVSqO0unXYj//Jy+jOmyhIseS+cXdurioNpqu4Y=; b=ZfVM+HXW+fkGhbGrnO6ODPNUmVpQmrOQNCqPVkYH66z+e20/fI/nqr6uUTQ2p/MLf1 ulXlso/AdviC18La5te5hZh5py8tbMZv7f9fjhAQ5m+Z3QjD/c6WWr+MXDY/j4/DFRvv lkU7FNQXCW9aZDpNtyb3N3GbfZFUf2HYViigY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AZ9ouVSqO0unXYj//Jy+jOmyhIseS+cXdurioNpqu4Y=; b=k0DBXTfSoOmY2vBfuMxI1JrpbkfoC1Y3j6aopweY5o3Ruy2kWCI3lQgBCMG9+esDcd txEH6FvvL08XxHzo6dpNGjRuNMKbziSOCwUQp0W3FSTK9focKHsr/qDios+1g8qITmTB jEDi6h2O5yhmbYWS/P5XQfjCBOaN+63F7/UtPP+Z555P6AIMtuMD3oyuflW7gQgrG33s UsPzGZtZ5/bBsuIdga8V7EMQKuWGce2w0PSx+rJPeFWTPLdKPBnTud4JNx2KHJ6vy0J8 PXNhP222//2MrtdAjp+SsiTLxcc8ZeyyY0MHkVLHn8BvlneRsXgA58AP9wPdeZ/x7eIZ 7lGw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOW+jcndy0lWp/ywn4+izyeeFOw1VCLQ99KeRO3jAjDAN/kaGkWqx8ZUzD16MynIkbiWjYe7eNKiOMJOjkr
X-Received: by 10.36.84.135 with SMTP id t129mr7090897ita.63.1472843023331; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 12:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.36.26.145 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:03:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2b68a777-c951-ee05-7d0f-8ade257d9972@labn.net>
References: <CAJt_5EiCuq2uv5R96uhSMrXdDJTvq52iS0cz-uZ=mizFv+ad+w@mail.gmail.com> <2b68a777-c951-ee05-7d0f-8ade257d9972@labn.net>
From: Pat Thaler <pat.thaler@broadcom.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 12:03:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJt_5Eh03TWAfDDHanHYXVwEz8PLiHt2M8LvyUfxzhd48_cicw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143d92237fba8053b8afdf8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/GpHE-lJpv_nUDN2RIgh791rjp7A>
Cc: detnet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 19:03:46 -0000

To clarify, my initial email opening the poll had the wrong closing date.
The closing date for this poll is Monday 5 September (because the opening
email went out late on a Friday, I counted the two weeks from Monday).

The poll is still going and I plan to announce the conclusion on Monday.

Regards,
Pat

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

> Sorry about being a day late on this.
>
> For the record, I want to restate my view from [1] that this document is
> not the right place for *any* mechanism definition -- and that the
> BIER-TE definitions should be removed prior to the document being
> published as an RFC.
>
> Lou
>
> [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/detnet/current/msg00693.html
>
> On 8/19/2016 2:53 PM, Pat Thaler wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > This is start of a two-week poll on making
> > draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03 a working group document. Please
> > send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
> > support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
> > document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd
> > like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
> >
> > The poll ends April 1, 2016
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Pat Thaler
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > detnet mailing list
> > detnet@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email