IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?

Pat Thaler <pat.thaler@broadcom.com> Thu, 15 September 2016 11:08 UTC

Return-Path: <pat.thaler@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDB312B0E8 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 04:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p93padHvtJSK for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 04:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22b.google.com (mail-vk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F334912B0FD for <detnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 04:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id m62so20654514vkd.3 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 04:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7bSKdS+L49FJVQEB98L6K82oahpHGeflQidStUPleEk=; b=US7nNz+rhjTs3Yi3MWox6RNexKGmhWfYryeH38ZUqvNvdwFvmUIM90c3cV1Ce9VK6b nOsK7z/GeysXz8osrnfil+cukU9RaFCYAJ0k6PEyiv/WKEgJ31lnaLpJWDh50zL9OWJE dhjYyVoS51U5FM7gTTLS5JzcSTzTzsi0dKmak=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7bSKdS+L49FJVQEB98L6K82oahpHGeflQidStUPleEk=; b=O/U24nTZKC39R9LmET8ou+Sp9rzCBVfYlKdOp+z0Nfntmq6SoAvuq4mmP2CAtQJLnL nW87k9Ffe6GZiJ8xN1E0OoZO3DXRsBLZNAZWljzGsESNo45y4xh/MSZHKtAHXm7SKM/j DUi/9h9lWi5kuHeu8+Lq2jSgjDd/J1PyLxkzZsMPMZLj93MtBMUjDMmdol7EuJgKHhC8 20tgmonuQ5QC+fw/mGTIqz1j0cP8ZCo8CNygwRrtFkN7KAD5J5S8NWjHqrIKPwAGIgwR 1yAxyFKXmbbZzlUzGZ7K+y69hnn+9M2UHjPXCb/W7Q4u8Oa+FPcghHbAQT+FVSJaem4U GtUQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOy1dEJe1z2EfgWkUOpCrKuNUsnW3wb+5cc4SkzUD9PDmenz0WhWQ89WqrZUEKQa5N2HHSWxURTXBvlEtUi
X-Received: by 10.31.148.14 with SMTP id w14mr2064559vkd.26.1473937709881; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 04:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.5.36 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 04:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+GutmWwMWrf32qgEsLMD+Xuy0t90j9iMB6SYkFD5pymuoEfzA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJt_5EiCuq2uv5R96uhSMrXdDJTvq52iS0cz-uZ=mizFv+ad+w@mail.gmail.com> <2b68a777-c951-ee05-7d0f-8ade257d9972@labn.net> <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C85DD807F7@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com> <2fdead88-1ccc-54d5-4158-60f8bfa7650f@labn.net> <CA+GutmVFcik0sK=1ipx0f9LDR3K+oQR3-CxWE+NLSHYQ-L0=6g@mail.gmail.com> <c1086ba6-0c3a-9c96-06fd-e4701d6bf54e@labn.net> <CAJt_5Ej+QV6kogL9KwTtH7ONcgO2y-oSMEKMkRph=vvUHpQn7Q@mail.gmail.com> <CA+GutmWwMWrf32qgEsLMD+Xuy0t90j9iMB6SYkFD5pymuoEfzA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pat Thaler <pat.thaler@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 04:08:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJt_5EhqfhGc68we4_X3DSGhMjyRdiWC0AuPVgLWihnPE1n_xg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114265de9f150f053c89dd79"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/9TIl2Gtu_YgHQh_t0wo7GZTTtys>
Cc: "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 11:08:33 -0000

Jouni,

Please upload the current (BIER-TE removed) draft as the -00 Working Group
draft.

The intent of my email was to make sure the comments don't get lost, but
would be addressed after the initial WG draft version.

Regards,
Pat

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com
> wrote:

> Loa's comment should have been addressed when the BIER-TE was taken out.
> Other comments from Anand's, Olivier's and some of Ethan's are good
> comments but from my point of view do not need to be addressed in the -00
> version. They all supported the adoption after all and comments were
> against the individual version of the draft. I am more than happy to
> implement them into the WG version of the draft if the rest of the WG
> agrees.
>
> - Jouni
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Pat Thaler <pat.thaler@broadcom.com>
> wrote:
>
>> There was a question from S.V.R Anand - it isn't clear to me whether that
>> would create a change in the draft.
>> There were commentsalong with a support from Oliver Marce.
>> Both those emails were August 22.
>>
>> Also, this from Loa Anderson:
>> While I support adopting he draft that will result from removing the
>> BIER-TE discussion my reading of this thread is that the RAND IPR
>> disclosure that Adrian pointed out is still in effect. Since we all
>> seem to be very careful (and rightly so) around IPR discussions, my
>> take is that we not have consensus to adopt the document with the
>> IPR disclosure still in effect.
>>
>> My understanding of the LOA was that it was submitted due to the BIER-TE
>> content. It would be good if Pascal would clarify that it no longer applies.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pat
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:40 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Jouni -- Are there any other issues raised during the adoption
>>> poll that have not yet been addressed?
>>>
>>> Lou
>>>
>>> On 9/14/2016 7:15 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>>> > Folks,
>>> >
>>> > I just submitted dp-alt-04 with BIER-TE carved out. I also implemented
>>> > grammar-only corrections proposed by Ethan.
>>> >
>>> > - Jouni
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jouni Korhonen, Broadcom Ltd.
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email