IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com> Tue, 20 September 2016 17:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CAD12B106 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NNJh9iAVR9ww for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22a.google.com (mail-pa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1261112B0D8 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id wk8so9090980pab.1 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=M2EhNR+Ul3S1a45l/jkiMfcxkEH0xe56/MHHDzw4bHc=; b=b+oNpW+DMjlW9QViEqr+/2rkUo92HoY/QlpaEUs25/iCj26VV71MbANebAndD1TV+N J8Xca0JL2r7QrNLb/2XPIxfJdHqfdTJ7h1JQAozZy5vMJZ/gos9dCE8fBg5J1tIgaGWo ql6Cbmco1Htd4m8VpcDj2iRp7o/kxZJtOYfmg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=M2EhNR+Ul3S1a45l/jkiMfcxkEH0xe56/MHHDzw4bHc=; b=TAs5RKlcVUKJU54McMOxmY65wjm88VeEEbBOEs1gWBdZ9wvl0p7Hpp7ewLNzimwkae cd/gsVb3aavinP8f2KxtmbpaEBQo8XESND7VrgxLTEuFU0yVvUioo2uAbvxIQUC6dj3Y MwSt+o66tZxp17bNU2hXsm7Kz+SOFvp0Edd2Z4e7aKmyLENasRffxuOfhUk4OsBtWPyO VbUcObuwkobthRJLCUWHeljfMwB5hXINM5xGYN/unlIHRvWshX3V3UVKZ512kmtpyhai 1Vy1rwte8YKZdTVtM7IHyGPU88FEdtOZUevgkHNLUqQu+Ga0+xQoWc3F9EHimvXa4zQn FTIA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPj4KwrH5+gdSAxJoQFqsASuA7m+nn7dB+zpiZ5wLKQQPCzybuLzmoLa8x0p6VYzynD
X-Received: by 10.66.235.100 with SMTP id ul4mr57621946pac.50.1474392595734; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (5520-maca-inet1-outside.broadcom.com. [216.31.211.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d14sm80585819pfb.50.2016.09.20.10.29.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
References: <CAJt_5EiCuq2uv5R96uhSMrXdDJTvq52iS0cz-uZ=mizFv+ad+w@mail.gmail.com> <2b68a777-c951-ee05-7d0f-8ade257d9972@labn.net> <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C85DD807F7@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com> <2fdead88-1ccc-54d5-4158-60f8bfa7650f@labn.net> <CA+GutmVFcik0sK=1ipx0f9LDR3K+oQR3-CxWE+NLSHYQ-L0=6g@mail.gmail.com> <c1086ba6-0c3a-9c96-06fd-e4701d6bf54e@labn.net> <CAJt_5Ej+QV6kogL9KwTtH7ONcgO2y-oSMEKMkRph=vvUHpQn7Q@mail.gmail.com> <CA+GutmWwMWrf32qgEsLMD+Xuy0t90j9iMB6SYkFD5pymuoEfzA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJt_5EhqfhGc68we4_X3DSGhMjyRdiWC0AuPVgLWihnPE1n_xg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pat Thaler <pat.thaler@broadcom.com>
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
Message-ID: <5edbf336-c511-5482-d2f0-5f5894969d65@broadcom.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:29:53 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJt_5EhqfhGc68we4_X3DSGhMjyRdiWC0AuPVgLWihnPE1n_xg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/cZQBPHkh7V5x2RKKyXtethOqUmM>
Cc: "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:30:18 -0000

Will do.

- Jouni

9/15/2016, 4:08 AM, Pat Thaler kirjoitti:
> Jouni,
>
> Please upload the current (BIER-TE removed) draft as the -00 Working
> Group draft.
>
> The intent of my email was to make sure the comments don't get lost, but
> would be addressed after the initial WG draft version.
>
> Regards,
> Pat
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Jouni Korhonen
> <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com <mailto:jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>> wrote:
>
>     Loa's comment should have been addressed when the BIER-TE was taken out.
>     Other comments from Anand's, Olivier's and some of Ethan's are good
>     comments but from my point of view do not need to be addressed in
>     the -00 version. They all supported the adoption after all and
>     comments were against the individual version of the draft. I am more
>     than happy to implement them into the WG version of the draft if the
>     rest of the WG agrees.
>
>     - Jouni
>
>     On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Pat Thaler <pat.thaler@broadcom.com
>     <mailto:pat.thaler@broadcom.com>> wrote:
>
>         There was a question from S.V.R Anand - it isn't clear to me
>         whether that would create a change in the draft.
>         There were commentsalong with a support from Oliver Marce.
>         Both those emails were August 22.
>
>         Also, this from Loa Anderson:
>         While I support adopting he draft that will result from removing the
>         BIER-TE discussion my reading of this thread is that the RAND IPR
>         disclosure that Adrian pointed out is still in effect. Since we all
>         seem to be very careful (and rightly so) around IPR discussions, my
>         take is that we not have consensus to adopt the document with the
>         IPR disclosure still in effect.
>
>         My understanding of the LOA was that it was submitted due to the
>         BIER-TE content. It would be good if Pascal would clarify that
>         it no longer applies.
>
>         Regards,
>         Pat
>
>         On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:40 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net
>         <mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote:
>
>             Thanks Jouni -- Are there any other issues raised during the
>             adoption
>             poll that have not yet been addressed?
>
>             Lou
>
>             On 9/14/2016 7:15 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>             > Folks,
>             >
>             > I just submitted dp-alt-04 with BIER-TE carved out. I also
>             implemented
>             > grammar-only corrections proposed by Ethan.
>             >
>             > - Jouni
>             >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     --
>     Jouni Korhonen, Broadcom Ltd.
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email