IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?

Pat Thaler <pat.thaler@broadcom.com> Wed, 14 September 2016 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <pat.thaler@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7F112B97F for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ci1MZJFvclOM for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x236.google.com (mail-yw0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 098CF12BD30 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x236.google.com with SMTP id u82so20516720ywc.2 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0vNN57abL8KcBO7jbKlNdLhNu5KnmA/6DheiTFPBbXY=; b=J6urqoxMEW7QapXbZEyoYzfkV93mkgjxEJxz7dzqjVFn7yzFHU+12b6q8fAfRFPcNO FFJtwftz81KmW1V/9KIYlfEud10F9mAMUvZV0/y3HwMG+ovdiMFQtj4lBRgrZp1B57++ VS3xBk4X+RS+qpvRQf3mLT6YXSMZbiXdvBF7M=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0vNN57abL8KcBO7jbKlNdLhNu5KnmA/6DheiTFPBbXY=; b=RDxQ7hZpfjIMoEOlzpoZos75m7qdJJnRSP1R956E7lyT4IZQOgWy9dD7T8O0hlH1Ta t88Fp83w9kZZLsn7KIrIIaOlEMiiVrezEIbtdscbDHQljDzRFXENY+zCfE9gwsdbtdic YkNiyKtU4mGlXwHvBbLcubZJqYADe6rdyFcnPQ0ifSzy8J3HRYEjLCtTBxvMrC5RAmil f48+k4t4PMAfTXi5gj8InurB82fxvXbOrjoPC2969/mCkmKQ+gBWqGN9w8Ezneby2L5v gUehyWcCfEcV7h5D4V8F4zVW+X3BQ4v9TSgB4q+pXXtW+DjbllyLl1vvMP7Ss/c6Ezbd D8FA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOTGoZGmOx9uTy0xgqiHtmnk/DUcwYzzW3uHom33yJB1DbZF71Le/ofR13lnxg0HW8NrDKjow+nwTp805wH
X-Received: by 10.13.241.199 with SMTP id a190mr2553205ywf.141.1473862261693; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.5.36 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <c1086ba6-0c3a-9c96-06fd-e4701d6bf54e@labn.net>
References: <CAJt_5EiCuq2uv5R96uhSMrXdDJTvq52iS0cz-uZ=mizFv+ad+w@mail.gmail.com> <2b68a777-c951-ee05-7d0f-8ade257d9972@labn.net> <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C85DD807F7@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com> <2fdead88-1ccc-54d5-4158-60f8bfa7650f@labn.net> <CA+GutmVFcik0sK=1ipx0f9LDR3K+oQR3-CxWE+NLSHYQ-L0=6g@mail.gmail.com> <c1086ba6-0c3a-9c96-06fd-e4701d6bf54e@labn.net>
From: Pat Thaler <pat.thaler@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:11:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJt_5Ej+QV6kogL9KwTtH7ONcgO2y-oSMEKMkRph=vvUHpQn7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0327208f2e6e053c784c5e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/iBrUUXf5Q7mlOSJz39CQ3H3RNfM>
Cc: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>, "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:47:17 -0000

There was a question from S.V.R Anand - it isn't clear to me whether that
would create a change in the draft.
There were commentsalong with a support from Oliver Marce.
Both those emails were August 22.

Also, this from Loa Anderson:
While I support adopting he draft that will result from removing the
BIER-TE discussion my reading of this thread is that the RAND IPR
disclosure that Adrian pointed out is still in effect. Since we all
seem to be very careful (and rightly so) around IPR discussions, my
take is that we not have consensus to adopt the document with the
IPR disclosure still in effect.

My understanding of the LOA was that it was submitted due to the BIER-TE
content. It would be good if Pascal would clarify that it no longer applies.

Regards,
Pat

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:40 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

> Thanks Jouni -- Are there any other issues raised during the adoption
> poll that have not yet been addressed?
>
> Lou
>
> On 9/14/2016 7:15 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > I just submitted dp-alt-04 with BIER-TE carved out. I also implemented
> > grammar-only corrections proposed by Ethan.
> >
> > - Jouni
> >
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email